My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/12/10 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/12/10 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:21:36 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:17:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 10,1980 <br /> SPECIAL PROPERTYse PERMIT RECONSIDERATIO -(CB 8012-508) <br /> President Overstreet explained this was a publiEm <br /> public which was reconsider ospec <br /> Property Use Permit request,from Mental Health operate <br /> temedCouncil had voted viler <br /> e �1,80m dset forth tM1 <br /> h <br /> guidelines to be follow evening. rhea <br /> wished.to ,hewould <br /> adopt <br /> ode <br /> e Planning Colmission' recommendation with conditions th. <br /> had set„oShould this befeated,he would then ask for a <br /> motion deny the mit,identifying specific <br /> Healthreasons and conclusions for the denial. <br /> President Overstreet said he would call upon the City Attorney to make <br /> a brief Services people would <br /> opportunityhave an <br /> talk and thend <br /> ne people could speak. <br /> He asked amp <br /> points already covered be brieflyemphasiseda.not be <br /> time-consuming.ttleney, a briefsummary of the bac <br /> anddo etissue. background <br /> t <br /> neighborhood a <br /> he <br /> and w mediate anynk kind of of acceptable,but <br /> feel the meetings were of value. <br /> prCattle explained what t dealing with special <br /> operty u permits,specifically t t <br /> reasonablycompatiblew andpotentialwithinthe <br /> general area <br /> in <br /> opased.to be <br /> must thaveserious adverse a the ecology and/or henvironment <br /> of the he <br /> community,and <br /> the <br /> the maineimpact in this convenience <br /> the <br /> r.ompatibilityeconcern. <br /> Mr.Cattle also ted that Council could make <br /> a decision o this <br /> matter this evening by a majority vote of the q quorum that carried <br /> theaction. <br /> oughs B.Marsh, f o0 w representing <br /> Mal Health <br /> a nfor the l <br /> it <br /> filed ga the City and Councilman heLd not feel <br /> reference the lawsuit w inaaandfelt it could be viewed <br /> as a threat,possibly influencgadecision. <br /> Baker felt i relevantand would merely s the <br /> legalri <br /> rights all those involved. <br /> isidecision on <br /> ch <br /> Councilman <br /> nd son said he wouldbackground is.m tea this eveningandknowledge di.not <br /> feel threatened by the lawsuit discussion. • <br /> ity A deal with this issue <br /> and bri utplegaltinformCationtsftexwardsild <br /> said t as the <br /> Mayor agreed with <br /> Pope <br /> spf the daa bya department not based <br /> on the m fthe <br /> group home. He felt it was not <br /> relevant to discuss the lawsuit at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.