My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/12/17 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/12/17 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:22:15 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
549 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> December 13,1980 <br /> meeting of the Everett City Council was called t order a <br /> •1hregular <br /> 00p ,December 17,1980 in the Council Chambers of <br /> Cittt y a.... <br /> GOSSION <br /> Presidentsaid <br /> na d this workshop <br /> � or Planning and Growth being <br /> ty to • <br /> communicate status to each other a Council. <br /> recommendations <br /> the <br /> suggested Commission Council expahe Commissions <br /> a p1atbeg <br /> • <br /> Jim emeses,of theo <br /> Planning C a <br /> Commission, <br /> felt of the time <br /> there w agreementbetween <br /> et <br /> s ot project <br /> e <br /> only a cases <br /> which r y <br /> instances someone <br /> acould come to the C cilmeet g to explain their <br /> Bobrecommen • <br /> Hummel felt it should be made more explicit in the minutes why a • <br /> project was denied if their pointof vdiffered from the staff. <br /> Councilman teth <br /> Kelson f e.ere was the <br /> _recommendations staff would b Planning commission it <br /> for Council to hearboth sides.President Overstreet e important <br /> asked a this would <br /> pose any problems and Brad saiid h would prefer n ving this •as <br /> the Commissioner present could be called ti <br /> a • <br /> we rigiinnalfindings <br /> presented. <br /> felt hereshould be <br /> innt that can be aidt specifically ss 1f there is split decision these • <br /> reasons should be articulated. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> John Friel ed he would inoott o be put in position <br /> nand sof <br /> coming to the ain <br /> aid <br /> he felt the Planninglstaff have beenldong ns air andoobjecti ob. <br /> Jim Langlois,of-the Gr Management Committee, h <br /> h authorization W fu onlyett the <br /> m.e end of atter o the <br /> Committee's <br /> Also,should the time nframe rbe tended,he <br /> questionedforcthe vailabillarificatiity.of Citymonies t the role of the continue and also <br /> conjunctionaskeCommission in <br /> w the work on fo Growth Management Committees study. <br /> brief ba policies of the <br /> Lan dathey we <br /> ne approaching finalization of Committee <br /> nchtw.ou'ld b Committee <br /> ulla o bee otos completed. <br /> t <br /> is happening in the County. Mr. f felt is l extremely <br /> ment tools.important to ensure consistency inathepappli t onwof growtthma ge- <br /> He asked again about theo£the Committee after December <br /> and ted.they would need tapproxi approximately <br /> months to <br /> lst <br /> complete their policy Locums but like to be able function <br /> through 1981. <br /> President Overgtreet said h felt it wouldCouncil's decision <br /> whether or not t <br /> end the time n thGrowth Management committee <br /> as y created this extend <br /> by resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.