My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/01/14 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/01/14 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:23:32 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:20:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/14/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 14,1081 21 <br /> appeals process and to make it consistent with the new Land Use Hearing <br /> Examiner Ordinance. The new appeal procedure <br /> appea amine <br /> were <br /> heard by the Environmental Review Committee,and requires <br /> tt the d decision of Hearing Examiner <br /> ' city ohl <br /> Council within10 days of the issuance of texearing Examiner's <br /> ila envwere automatically <br /> ironmental <br /> is to receive the wccenTneo :geaia ' <br /> tied as the official <br /> said <br /> Environmental <br /> pe Review recommended <br /> t that <br /> oeldsb left <br /> was°to evaluate impacts of new non-residential <br /> lopment whicin. This h would <br /> lade f r reduce <br /> housing <br /> should-O this b t in the ordinance.-The other area of concern with <br /> existing9the <br /> he left - Committee <br /> and eas Section 25. They felt this should <br /> n toogthere <br /> uestablished therefore 1 ordinance. He <br /> i. reviewed other changes throughout the ordinance also. <br /> Councilman Aldcroft asked ithis ordinance <br /> had been distributed to <br /> lope'tbeconcerned-with w and Mr. <br /> Landlee a delay on <br /> he <br /> nom finaldistrretedads dui g this inane until January ethsaid this had not been done,but there ulsobthese could be <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked if Cher grandfather <br /> ordinance regarding people who had waadoption of this ordinance,and Grant s <br /> lopmclause <br /> Assistantagreed - city <br /> something sefn the <br /> ordinance regarding h. ype <br /> of problem. <br /> Councihnan Overstreet alsosuggested should to something in <br /> writing the as to who is shouldthe <br /> de g hextension, od <br /> City n <br /> candles said this would be taken care of also <br /> ndMr <br /> prior to adoption. <br /> Oisions <br /> ipactS <br /> sl r <br />• nal <br /> Mt M <br /> Do ia <br /> On motion the meeting adjourned at 12:55 p. .— „e, <br /> erence <br /> City Cie" <br /> mitt <br /> ee Read and approved as printed. (IL' <br /> i ed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.