My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/01/14 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/01/14 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:23:32 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:20:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/14/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> January 14,1951 <br /> uncilman <br />,e movedthe L.ID.Michelson, approveestdblishang uunrise the City prepare anordinance <br /> L.I.D. <br /> Roll was called with all Iouncilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Canned <br /> BIOS RECEIVED-(CB e11-91 <br /> s reoenvea for the mprowe,,,ent t0 .1 stat,, 8271Porines4were as to=ss: <br /> 1st t General on ruc n,Inc.-Bellingham 5 z <br /> 99,947.05 <br /> Eerkes Contracting,/nc.-Mt.Vernon 306,428.27 <br /> rettSlant.F91818lY,inc.-Everett 329,864.89 <br /> Will Construction Co.,Inc.-Everett 332,484.75 <br /> e Sheldrup <br /> ar ors-RAMC°oninc.e vrklana 332,537.40 <br /> 335,013.00 <br /> ante <br /> Ralph Bishop Construction Co.-Seattle 339,892.61 <br /> The e Corporation <br /> 394,032.60 <br /> Construction,Inc.Woodinville <br /> oodinville <br /> mP - Teem Ventures-Federal w 7,897.63 <br /> Lak <br /> ue <br /> 1V Consultant n nE <br /> tcne-gineering,Inc. 413,302.50 <br /> saBellevue 422,192.40 <br />'rr • Seaboard Construction Co -Bainbridge Island 3,5]6.25 <br /> E.E.Larsen Construction Co.,Inc.-Seattle 511,726.41 <br /> Staff was recommending to award the contract to the low bidder,IMC° <br /> old General Construction,Inc.for the amount of$299,947.05. <br /> Bruce Jones,Assistant City Attorney,said in the sstipu- <br /> lated <br /> bid documents there was no place to set separate amount, <br /> I said the other question ralged by the second low bidder wsales tax out as separately.there <br /> no non-collusion <br /> here was <br /> plan nahavn tthe lthey ed by the low:node <br /> the time of contract award. <br /> elt these omissions <br /> and that the bra cool arded to the low bidder,were not maternal <br /> ain Peter Ralston,Attorney <br /> g the second low bidder,Eel:sus Con- <br /> tracting,Inc.,drsagreed <br /> nim.definitely were maternal andtask dntheeCowcnl to award ths and said he felt ebid,o his omissionsese <br />.loseesaid alsolhst'athat nWrs [eloe f et <br /> 3 no affidavitw not in t packageandttut it was not necessary to be included. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.