1981/01/28 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

35 January 28,1981 • angles,o Department,a e • fetter a t nag s said inasmuch a day he had written these h recommendations wing consider parathem. The graph recommendation s under using necessary. The Council took no action on this. against t didthis e decision sides n he nd mr.handles ath therefore othe commented Councilman dof feels the ordinance as proposed should not be changed. , He said Councilman he under ,Ahow a felt that a • neddsubsection however, this s at it wasaa e little clearer on subsection 3,and therefore recommended leaving this an. handles pointed o than nTthe he sordinance ioSee- tion recommended ed whithere they dedtt workshop. a - sigdnlficance whichissuedoto - e of this le allob oneye 7 of earaftert same 9.8.3.the word pylic after nthe. "building Section 18, sbfor oran"stipulated" had been ch "established" the pend hof the paragraph3words or amendments thereto had been added. 1awords 0 days"h ad • • been Changed to 710 calendar days to coincide with the land use hearing • na He said idalso the title had b ted,stating to an di or nance "repealing"Ordinance 582 rather than amending Ordinance inance582 Councilman ad 0 kwords"days"in the ordinance calendar oworking a and Mr.handles s • office wasbestthe word. =e l • rather than to specify as everyone interpreted it to mean calendardays. Councilman 0 ify the p cess • ..and stipulatesdefinitelyle r calendar or workingidays. Attorney,n- grant Weed, said thisadditional e seAssistant the definitions and would cause no problem and • perhaps would clarify it. seconded Councilman Pope aved, Councilman Overstreet, bye meshfolan edabsedie nll w cwuldr d resug omteCunwrkhpto14-eL%dp, enteal ow. ys • Jahn Maar,from bhp nneing C with 5 8.3 oteir aP constructioniod for gDeclaration ointo liartpper af Non- Significance. He said hthey takbeen required epanother look atit their ltheir long- range plans and the total project.