My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/03/11 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/03/11 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:22:36 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:23:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
3/11/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
103 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-SEATTLE SORER REVC1lOPMENT Co.-(Ca alp-al) <br /> from this contg a ract lublic hearing on iapplication <br /> 00th St I-0(south of et of <br /> fMultiple-Family Lo9TDensity or tial Everett <br /> 111 <br /> ication was <br /> refhavHearingExaminerwarehouse. Be determined thathle did not <br /> the <br /> 3. =L=1= <br /> = dvedt1 othis pW'ltc rnrh byest because of the zthe£ <br /> o15ic with h the matter and since there was unhethe <br /> us <br /> PPealed it to th y Council.no a aIo y vote,thepplrcant <br /> nGilman Michelson concerned about truck <br /> thena access going through <br /> T President Baker questioned the use of PUD <br /> and ma$fight-of-way <br /> 6o ed nowe <br /> street ass,and in <br /> c y wesa <br /> cce [hi rseing.workon . <br /> Councilmaninquired about <br /> y hTd a eappealedpto Planning <br /> - <br /> ti <br /> ,) Said the appeallwde th expedite the <br /> nnis <br /> onsiaeratlon and 1 was not nh <br /> applicationand <br /> ableavete by n <br /> a <br /> is <br /> them.k Ed Han.,rePreeeating ane to tron <br /> h vnee h aapltcanti addressed <br /> fF erZf as <br /> However,100th St. an has as now been reaca LID and the aPplicant gaS not Willing m <br /> resolving this h <br /> Celia Strong, <br /> streets and the possible'alternatives available. Since licant <br /> 1.91thas rezone h reso Attorney or 100th the conflict <br />• ' GounctIman Ogerstreet asked how many ugits this area would support, <br />, h the total capacity for multiple dwellings in the city and whether <br /> or nOt there shoo d <br /> Lesss hien <br /> usewould be best suited for commercial also access for residential dueis h <br /> e proximity to the <br /> not ideal. Also,the <br /> t Cotis now providing areas ror this glype o <br /> shouldna a great deal of the demand. a leve opment which <br /> nadim Harper,proponent,gave a brief background history of his <br /> ante tiodn. His original plan to construct condominiums was not <br /> to receive City approval in developing the prePertY in <br /> ngr <br /> detention pond, ia <br /> use of th p F ty• <br /> eliminating traffic load,etc and p posing lesser <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.