Laserfiche WebLink
162 <br /> April'15,1981 <br /> SPECIAL PROPER BIBERATIO -ICE 8142159) <br /> President a reported that a public hearingn he <br /> l <br /> d before <br /> the <br /> acing E athis m and w public m <br /> g <br /> tonightheld recommendations made re, <br /> remarks'sill limited to already onrecord. <br /> Gerry Ervine, PlanningB briefly <br /> vbackground e <br /> the Special <br /> Property Permit issued to w3Mobile Home Park,an area <br /> f apvoximlat7701X Roadconsisting of <br /> 122 unralso addressed a in certain areas <br /> of of the various <br /> fin, said <br /> initial <br /> non specified n the original permit issued <br /> not complied with back in 176 <br /> ded that at <br /> Special <br /> be re-approved subject <br /> conditions. Mr. <br /> recommended achangeconditionsetting u <br /> i <br /> board <br /> by deleting designation o Planning Department be <br /> of this board. Also,a felt <br /> of he bond referred to in <br /> condition <br /> on1 'Y should 5 Ervine <br /> concernedsettling,drainage vegetation <br /> problems. _ <br /> Councilman <br /> Michelson was <br /> naslsbregarding <br /> certain conditions,such as gutters,downspouts adplies <br /> Mr.Ervine beet certainbile <br /> home should f the o <br /> they k owner should b responsible for the pad leased <br /> to the resident. <br /> Councilman Pape asked what would pi e p ear <br /> comply with the c psaid ywould <br /> have the <br /> rightos <br /> the mobile home park. <br /> Russell Baker,Wes 9 baleerepresenting <br /> the <br /> owner,amine he felt carte.v Examiner <br /> presented <br /> theore <br /> cthis He a several of items involved variations from <br /> 3rd had been ignored and should be considered <br /> city code, <br /> President Baker then suggested <br /> that Mr. <br /> Baker and Sim/les,Assistant <br /> City Attorney,conferprivately on this eft the meeting <br /> to dO SO. <br /> condition 9 reBruce McFaliand, <br /> orney for <br /> stridge,commented on <br /> - <br /> garding dtdownspoutsPoe a felt the problem here would <br /> be the <br /> dealingenforcement and that it would be difficult to evict a tenant who refused <br /> to comply. Also,that they were h <br /> with es an <br /> effectchanges could be a problem beforethe p f thelease <br /> Councilman Pope <br /> asked why o conditions we 976'a o <br /> there were 18of the 18 were original conditions <br /> and,others were addressing soMe <br /> were relative to the mobile lhome park codessues in a e specific manner. Also, <br /> BakerPresident suggested ondit n R9 could be added at the time <br /> a tenant sleasemest <br /> p foirenewal. <br /> nd Baia they would not object to the amount of the bond being <br />} $10,000. .. <br /> 1 <br />