My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/04/22 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/04/22 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:25:43 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
4/22/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-112 <br /> April 22,1981 <br /> President Baker <br /> returned t <br /> meeting time. <br /> IPUBLLCHEARINGPROPOSE08.W.EVERETTSEWERLIOCB 813-120) <br />{ <br /> formation reported this ims the <br /> I hearing of the S.W.Everett Sewer Local Improvement <br /> written protests or objections concerning the formation of this LID <br />. should by now have been. tional written protests fwith the City Clerk. He said any addi- <br /> iled <br /> received and considered if filed during <br />! who sentitled <br />,1 this hearing. Everyone proposed LO,or who is authorised to represent such a property owneropportunity to be <br /> ( in attendance and will be recording heard <br /> i said <br /> Court <br /> 1 the person addressed the Council tlearly <br />: their name and speak slowly and cin order for the Court Reporter <br /> 10 afford individual <br /> properly rd er <br /> ] nduceLe `oohee bond counsel, <br /> He that the ion to the Council,ex- <br /> mf: <br /> ownersproperty opportunity <br /> heiroensne objections they o <br /> the acquisition <br /> reasons fUanttaes <br /> people may also speak in favor of the project ifthey choose <br /> . to do so. Council members wish to bear whatever information le <br /> want to present concerning the proposed sewer LID and no formal rules <br /> of evidence will control these proceedings. He said the purpose is not <br /> . to answer in detail or discuss at length questions out the amounts <br /> • of estimated individual assessments,instead it is to allow the property <br /> opportunity to present any information to <br /> Council <br /> i` before action is taken on the question of whether or not to slfo[ ealing with <br /> . specific amounts of final assessments. efor L10. <br /> future <br /> sedsewer improvements <br /> ate <br /> I- Preliminary estimated assessments and the <br /> will be noted and may be <br /> d to later in the hearing. Everyone <br /> uld be assured today who <br /> iled a <br /> or <br /> se <br /> hes to <br /> I speak will the p vemen[ as f a0,addressing <br /> es nge red,Council about whether <br /> w e improvement and,a swhatta <br /> IL Bill Morey,of CH2M-Hill,described the proposed LID a being bounded <br /> roughly b .Japanese G - and sM n <br /> He said there were 23 owners of the 144 parcels which covered 1,455 <br /> I 1 He said the <br /> 983 cost,including legal fees,engineering,etc. <br /> ts,state <br /> fi er and0001er would be paid by direct a <br /> ont cts such as Mukrlteo and eAlderwoodsManor, <br /> 1! water <br /> and City contributions. <br /> Clair Olivers,of the Engineering Department,then reported the PrePoseo <br /> iimprovements financed by the Local improvement District consist of the <br /> Ufollowing. <br /> €[ <br /> itE 3. Pump teoStation <br /> E ptor Segment) <br /> 5. Treatment Plan[Headworks. Southwest interceptor • <br /> 4. South End interceptor thein 5 nt) <br /> valuation• <br /> • He said the current assessed s$13,820,040 a a <br /> value256 of the improvement is$5,072,213. There are no outstanding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.