Laserfiche WebLink
April 29,1961 <br /> Gilman Gipson asked what effect,r iCal system and Chief all to Sectio <br /> n 14 <br /> E vaaaaa have ea the <br /> ave an adverse effect. This change <br /> give <br /> ion <br /> er or <br /> t it wishes <br /> otiate an <br /> company <br /> wouldbetract athat <br /> i he felt it...Id notadministration the n cit was ddoesn business felt <br /> to transport ulanp rents. <br /> e available el Cit <br /> pointed1 1 in answer to a question by Councilman ter enegotiated, <br /> then rzoved by <br /> Councilman ldcwas <br /> necessary f <br /> he <br /> City to <br /> ambulancee an contract as he rooks at this vat <br /> entrprieventurem matter. <br /> 1 President Baker <br /> fowere substitutedo[ [ rthectinarifianddiBr if the t which would <br /> Cattle stated this <br /> oycouncildfor approvaloor rel tion. <br /> 11 <br /> on if <br /> Contract developed <br /> over <br /> rrtwh the r no e could City <br /> amen lacer <br /> whetheror [ce C ashould amended later a <br /> problem <br /> asked o ive approval beforethe <br /> Mayors anyTcof ont act Cattlelany iedath firer was <br /> then bring t back fohin the r Lobs,.app[val. <br /> to negotiate <br />� .lman of servicenow given our z feltgarding the system should high <br /> be <br /> 114levelft chis concerns itizen, <br /> left intact. <br /> Chi <br /> said he did <br /> t feel our <br /> tem would <br /> ade <br /> 1 to of nthee est vicer ossible at he leastt amounme an t ofomo o the ore <br /> proposed <br /> get amendmentsb being m <br /> ordinanceand <br /> 1 <br /> y. <br /> e fel..word may"should remain in order t allow m <br /> flexrbr�typin the negotiating Apr cess. <br /> 1 Councilman Aldcroft suggested wording Section 14"The and/or his <br /> (- desinee,with the concurrence of the annual agreement with one or more ambulance Cmay <br /> ecomp anegotiate n <br /> President Baker said she felt the main issue in Section 14 was the use <br /> of the word may o["shall.,not Council's concurrence of the contract.. <br /> 11 Committee oulreview <br /> Councilman Overstreet felt Thee ions to Councilandthat this matter <br /> should be tabled untiamendments and make l that time. <br /> i/t hthat the ESRC committee rya already requestedthis but lad been informed <br /> President Bak,said she ddbeened solved, <br /> I Chief McNall t submitted agreed that the <br /> report to read ceased <br /> ea. to function and had not <br /> in <br /> c csuestiorsed whet is requirement is not met. He dwte was tablenot <br /> esAC Committeeas in violation of the <br /> ordinance if hhad time to be formulated atinuing,but would make nmotion <br /> repot bank to Council e <br /> it <br /> 1 <br />