Laserfiche WebLink
226 <br /> May 20,1881 <br />• PUBLIC DISCUSSION-COLBY CROSSWALK-(Ce 615-221) <br /> Joe and of events which led <br /> up to ethmeetingski,City Staff mingei had voted <br /> to reconsider all alternatives to the Colbi crosswalk problem and head <br /> 1• public input on these alternatives. Mr.Koziovski said he would no, <br /> t Council would come to some decision this evening on this matter. <br /> Councilman d be made this evening <br /> as council had just received additional material in he e <br /> Pecket and has not sufficient time to study it. He suggeeted <br /> handling this session dlike workshop and then come back to resolve the <br /> iss <br /> d: Councilman ked approximately ho already been spent b <br /> i nail vandn a department tmeet thought approximately$3Ve000e <br /> 540,000 for s feeslan n he did no th <br /> exact <br /> ? Mr.Kozle ski then presented a <br /> as follows. summary of the alternatives for the Colby <br /> pro <br /> lem <br /> • <br /> Four-lane o overcrossing w a underneath; <br /> Two-lane auto overcrosiing with iall area underneath; <br /> Four-lane auto undercrossing, <br /> to <br /> arrann tiagesroroaa s. <br /> • <br /> level which tau` 3 th cwi arointhisn the <br /> at present curb P <br /> P eg and <br /> �o• <br /> • control entry to block; <br /> lls at each crosswalk on regular during lass changes to continuous pre-empted <br /> srea with roadway <br /> belsnarrowed <br /> 4th and 25th to pre-empt to divert traffic <br /> classduring <br /> Closureof Colby periods; <br /> rom 24th to 25th. <br /> 11 r g sfic count in the area chool hours which showed additional <br /> b traffic the <br /> i closure of Colby P Wetmore and nY <br /> • <br /> Councilm <br /> n Overstreet asked if the <br /> affic on these streets <br /> exceeded the <br /> /) the limit on lm between 9 an peand questioned or on Colby and 2 ah ether anyone had talked reaching <br /> 1 the impadt of the closure. He also pointed out when Wetmore is closed <br /> FkSt.'to Everett Ave.regarding <br /> by the h add to the <br /> problem, <br /> fp ab <br /> g <br /> tthesa Y hazardnow. <br /> i Councilman Gipson asked Joe noslovski safest what <br /> alternative he felt was the , <br /> d replied it-would be n alternative that separated <br /> 1 vehicular and pedestrian traffic. <br /> 4 <br />