Laserfiche WebLink
,6P <br /> June lo,1981 <br /> Mr.Cattle said it defeated,the LID oulddrequire 4 votes g o pass the shouldnopt <br /> the <br /> oposed ordinance it may do so at this time. <br /> the decision is <br /> to expand the boundaries of the L.the procedure must start over <br /> essed the <br /> ce of basing <br /> sai P roper aid testimony presented should be best <br /> erest of the general aef lltnzenrapublicdetof erminat <br /> made rett <br /> as well as thether his will be of affected propertYefit to the owners. <br /> Councilman <br /> Overstreet dhw <br /> concerned a installation costs <br /> that ould e d byproperty owners and Brad Cattle said these <br /> hook-up c a be included <br /> this time. He said hato include an addition <br /> wouldto Section 2 that scould be <br /> included in <br /> n <br /> LIB at the oPtion of hwad at <br /> the eon <br /> propertyof each tfnannc <br /> through he <br /> Liu or en another <br /> .11 was then called on the motion to le with cilmen voting <br /> d Councilmen <br /> and Movp n,who we ed. Pe Alacroft <br /> exceptMotion Failed <br /> Michelson,to am <br /> iii by f allow <br /> td <br /> Neeo d y inserting <br /> e of the LID or <br /> decision to be at the option <br /> ev inclusion b <br /> e hook-up costs to be spread over the ver all P ,p saidpaid for at the tame of installation, h Installation t of <br /> the d property <br /> enly o <br /> Brad cattle card he was not sure whether this could he done legally. <br /> CRoll was ouncilmen Aieerbfttan amendment <br /> Gip on,�twath all who were excused.Councilmen votingexcept <br /> Amendment carried <br /> Moved by Councibnan Michelson,seconded by p A. <br /> declared that this is <br /> e ordinance, <br /> directedo call the rollthe Bal disposition <br />