Laserfiche WebLink
..Fr <br /> g,s <br /> June 17,1261 <br /> on <br /> 5age 26,H6-3.2,theyare posing an sentence be added to paragraph "Aggressive aloabate luns 31 <br /> rh ng air uity P tefaminumdustl. <br /> 'verl afthe <br /> fyma asked heC <br /> ouncil and <br /> Growth <br /> they could have a better concept o£the whole port, this document <br /> so <br /> caro <br /> Davis,of 9.25 Pine,said that <br /> _.. i groups document <br /> accepted b t <br /> on a schedule every two hecounci 1 ocoedput n 1 meetingsbegelns or so in theso chat the Tannin <br />, commission could receive input from the g <br /> i'orxas and i neighbor- <br /> hoods uld be p rmedashahow t as reptisbeingimphat lemented. <br /> said o„ Steve Burr,of 3425 1alip d cFcirmats a of the Port Gardner igxborhood C <br /> dressed in the <br /> some that are <br /> ially impertant to Port <br /> government awarmness of there <br /> are <br /> Gardner residents.instance,ensuring access ad promoting r yneighborhood identiy,and e particular <br /> qualityproblems that affect neighborhood <br /> of life,assurebetween compatibility <br /> promoting <br /> rrmg` � eeierav <br /> xxeae were alna m; y supported them. <br /> He Said the Port Gardner residents are opposed to PRD's in R-1 <br /> He said they <br /> • says zones.L hba3 it is nd <br /> plied by developers and those in the Planning said detached g <br />, the rwsidents are concerned aboUts Those are the. citizens are expecting the Council to preserve for then, He chze are the arthe <br /> acteristics <br /> the <br /> neighborhood had told the Council and the Planning Commission many times <br /> that they do not support an ordinance He said last Monday nighthi <br /> prohibit?Oat Gardner public facility improvenmnt plan.the land ad u paroved t e ne ):. <br /> and zonlm <br /> goals of which is to <br /> to take this into consideration. in a-1 zones. H ed the Councal <br /> rhis,of the <br /> Lowell neighborhood are called attention <br /> be page 40 <br /> of fieh9 environmentally sadidentifiee ui nes and sareasensitive l <br /> her criteria should be ,, <br /> ot sizes,areas such <br /> solds,streams and ras ravines,gl)ey unstable <br /> other buldab ex should be disregarded Also, <br /> continuous parcels of environmentally sensitive <br /> and,stricter limitations <br /> of land that can be a p a.should be placed on these areas dins a reduction n rn t per <br /> She said theyshould disallow bonus densities in $�1 <br /> and any new single fondly zone,and that R-1 should remain detachedSingle f <br /> amily,utilizing existing 7,000 square feet minim=lot require- <br /> PRO's with <br /> a wed. '� 1Ca r o nnn Lisa ns <br /> ecifShe said under R-1.5 zone,the committee felt the R-1 zone goals and { <br /> maintain aseningttetaddition to the dcr ai _all goals d policiesthis zoning hta`nea in g ashould placed.nport <br />