My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/06/24 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/06/24 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:30:07 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:30:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/24/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4( ygl <br /> F1lune34bJ981 <br />• He said the TAC had <br /> dthese alternatives <br /> s <br /> plc <br /> ethe <br /> highest priority o placing span wires over the crosswalks <br /> sign..which <br /> operate <br /> aasclass hours, <br /> but will ctivatebybelled during class c <br /> o continuous <br /> red. This will dfvide protectedpedestrian <br /> movmendd <br /> • <br /> ;Vertw d4rfet$heos re. Xldsadrth <br /> e <br />[ alternative would cosiapproximately 25,000. <br /> Councilman <br /> ritanarrowedlanes <br /> ulta be a substantialsavngsnd Cameron said there would dl <br /> d <br /> not he.• <br /> then asked about_rthe possibility o motorists <br /> Councilman <br /> caught Overstreet <br /> signs and aid there someone was kung <br /> be <br /> ample timeprovidedwould n occur unless <br /> up or dropping o students. <br />• np <br /> from 64 24 feet at the crosswalks,narrowing Colby to two lanes, <br /> to widthth no signal This c l <br /> approximately$2 <br /> 5,000. <br /> ifslanalswre rtotal t$5000 <br /> However,, <br /> thislternativewould not clearly assign right-of-way w, ut <br /> the <br />• signals. <br /> Another alternative be a theintintersections maintain <br /> four tlanes and w ldcosel250,0This weuld <br /> have a affect on the sr streets and be confusing t <br /> to motorsstsnaiso pointed o Fother ale <br /> alternatives previously mentioned <br /> of closing Co by during school hoursand tPermanentgradeleepa <br />• <br /> Me said t suggestion o using poles v nthe mid-block Colby <br /> would not work as M1 cominatioonpoles tint also hold t tree <br /> lights. eto instead of span wire over the <br /> crosswalks would be estimated at$134,000. This cost would b <br /> basedonsalvage materials b Underground inner connectors <br />• nd <br /> a new signal controller would be needed. <br /> d felt a <br /> alternative Councilman Ashould tbeachosen id he wthat as pcanab tmonitored t monitored and <br /> P, <br /> the effect t <br /> lesserand that would have a triedrseveral <br /> y sure consider something more for several <br /> that a cast more. <br /> Councilman Michelson spoke against reducing the width of <br /> Colby. • <br /> Mayor Moore said <br /> cright-of-way <br /> h scan wire crosswalk <br /> signal <br /> alernative a assign <br /> f y ad liability <br /> itwoldb <br /> lessened. This systemwould d just during school hours <br /> be if a pedestrian <br /> alkbutton <br /> Councilman cost <br /> approximately650,000t arraincorporated <br /> this and Mr <br /> s as required a different_actuationsystem.Cameron a. <br /> Moved by Councilma0Gi0000,nseconlc aby gouncilman <br /> Tale c c0lbyt,to <br /> t.91gh&scheol and to uce the widths f Colby ram LI set <br /> to 44feetat the crosswalks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.