My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/07/01 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/07/01 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:30:53 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
7/1/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 1,1981 <br /> mounciinwn Gipson suggested it might I. <br /> standards and asked.if it uld be pos <br /> area as.being re suitable_o dessrble etcnecessary <br /> an other areas.e9to identify anyculax <br /> • Gilman Michelsond build on said <br /> lhe you,.like to see and n how <br /> ,e wasthey vor of Pan's. He said <br /> salty wenihWaen attached asked <br /> what <br /> the about a bu per acre. g areas and Dennis Gregoire said <br /> it was 4-5 except for stone Terrace South,which was <br /> Dennis Gregoire then addressed the issues of the Comprehensive Plan, <br /> traffic impacts,utilities, <br /> al areas and compatibility <br /> the project as <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> ed in the..Pindilgs and Conclusions of e f <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Councilman Gipson pointed out one area he would like to have discussed <br /> at some tin.and that was that there was a lack of unification amongst <br /> the Commission <br /> s point an tmembers. He felt this unknown should e addressed at <br /> • <br /> Mr.Gregoire sed how the proposed base density was t by staff <br /> and the Planning Coamission. It was felt that this base density <br /> criteria <br /> c ightofrom thuld be e beg n it now ngthat this issue would be absolutely <br /> He pointed out the zoning in this proposal was C-2 and did not <br /> require are'zening chanes. Also,no.prohlea. <br /> in <br /> existed and there would <br /> adjacent property owners fromthis development. <br /> dbe no additional costs to be Placed on utilities <br /> Councilman Overstreet pointed out the inference <br /> Everett Sewer link-up wan being assessed on density and <br /> that <br /> might use this to substantiate their request fora higherpdensityroponents <br /> base. <br /> meads. oa veviewe door an -est link andrposslblel fvc <br /> • <br /> • <br />• cilmman Pope asked if impactd ba <br /> avavlableressed <br /> as he tto b this also shoupedladjacent to itd be considered in light of been y areas <br /> • <br /> nertnin Gregoire said that Evergreen Way <br /> street at this time and has been nalyzedsa Pally developedsuch,nded as and <br /> the traffic analysis took this into Comm a a standpoint. <br /> couldCommission felt the streets handle consideration. <br /> increase in traffic <br /> • <br /> Councilman <br /> the increase in traffic would cause a wait <br /> an intersection <br /> nte se p carsg to en to the mar w of t <br /> Councilman Pope asked for the <br /> 1.W.Gregoire Sara.there have beentbnegotiations this regard. and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.