Laserfiche WebLink
( 31R <br /> July 0,1901 <br /> GROWTH MANAGEMENT REPORT-PUBLIC SERVICES SECTION-ICS 017-295) <br />. Management Report to <br /> President Baker said today,section of the Gtowth . <br />' be discussed by the Council would be the Public Services <br />, said if the Council had any disagreements with any portion of this,they <br />• <br /> s today prior to it <br /> oing to the Planning Commission. <br /> should discuss xhufele this was a good gaonument and he has n0 problems <br /> Councilman Gipson <br />• President Baker said if there. report they would go to Goal 5 the preface <br /> of g of <br /> the <br /> suitable vacant land and appropriate intensive"'oning,in areas Encourage <br /> consistent <br />, with the comprehensive plan• services. There were no guencrons on thus secxron. existing public <br />• Under Goal PS-2 phased <br /> public <br />.• services into wCouncilman <br /> aia �i <br /> had reviewed theannexationpolicyof <br /> the city and the reply was yes. <br /> Goal PS-3 t. sis hat those <br /> melytP <br /> who benefit pay in proportion to that benefit,and assure <br /> Carol Davi,of R25 Pine,questioned PS-3.1. the <br /> econd para- <br />• <br />-• graph stated"However,other property owners whr in the future,should pay o materiallyedsbenef <br /> exactlyeir <br /> • She asked what prhptdevenop <br />• either presently <br /> proper <br /> os <br /> son <br /> y,that• developed his personshould pay for the service also. <br /> Vi � "'Develop a comprehensive and transportation <br /> rsnss,em.s=eicoesented mmented ogee= ea <br /> e Council <br /> for Great• Everett and er <br /> a-. One was to state thatt" additional priorities be added <br /> residential <br /> , used as criteria for developing the volume of trafficthat the street <br /> used Federal Avenue past Jackson School as an example. <br /> traffic have the priority over <br /> requested <br /> trafefic efficiency..the trucks parkeahenuused 12th <br /> hnand <br /> Walnut as the <br /> ple <br /> were having difficulty seeing. <br /> • <br /> o Councilman Gipson felt this problem redto the TAC rather <br />• <br />, than the Planning Commission and the reply was that it <br /> would be directed <br />`... tThere was no o bath' streams,• quality of includingn .Restore andor maintain the <br /> as <br /> associated aesthetic and/fisheries <br />"�' Goal PS-6 stated.In providing for new or Puhiic services" <br /> miniMize negative impacts,especially <br /> onw mp oVed neighborhoods.. <br /> Carol Davis again questioned policy <br /> ch stated <br /> nsure that the <br /> the <br /> • • existing character nd/ordesign of pending street rz affectedn considerationmprovements takes into <br /> going. thought this was problem <br /> because <br /> ethere were residences.manyEa sked <br /> eas <br /> iI.' , that were zoned R-3 but had only <br /> how this was going to be <br /> . Gary Doughty,of the <br /> to single family homesinthe neig <br /> hborhood othe e <br /> ning <br /> df though it was an <br /> ntR-3zene. <br /> Department,replied sign of the e <br /> goals,. Therywere no questions on goal PS-7 which stated sCoordinate <br /> to strategies with affectedgovernmental entities an approp - <br /> Fagencies.. <br />