Laserfiche WebLink
3i4 <br /> July 14,1981 <br /> 1 <br /> Councilman Gipson asked how the propos densitY in COUncilmen POP,. <br /> motion compared to the ad,oining goire said <br /> that density was 4.6 DU's per acre.compared to e proposed rhood andDennis e5 <br /> on buildable area. Based n the figure of 423 and 60.5 buildable , <br /> the density would be 6 <br /> cCuncilvmn Michelson said he felt a o 6,000 square feet shouldfbe specified and Mr.Gregoire said that <br /> are bein9 Priced out uf the reach of most PeoPle. Be felt there <br /> reducedbe a problem with the proposed densityfigure that.would only <br /> y <br /> allow the developer a 20%bonus. <br /> Councilman Pope said he felt 423 units was high enough in that area <br /> and that a 208 bonus should be sufficient. <br /> implications relative to <br /> single family e felt <br /> councilman Overstreet asked if there were any <br /> units as addressed in the report <br /> said <br /> the sintypes eshouldnbe addressed separately. <br /> E snsaid he felt the single family detached provision could <br /> cause someproblems because of topographical layout of some of the area. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked if there was any testimony <br /> athat <br />! would indicate this area should not have any <br /> nd Brad <br /> Cattle said he felt this question was asking o s at sing manyd in this <br /> hours of testimony <br /> $ motion it would b t h ion t to address <br /> Councilman Pope said he was concerned about crime in the City and if <br /> devdense housing e wondered where <br /> the echildren lopers ewere re lgoing to play,etc. <br /> Councilman Gipson later. ted dealing with the density issue now and then <br /> housing yp <br />- f ( Moved by Councilman Gipson,seconded by Councilman Overstreet,to amend <br /> family amendment d dwelling units,floor by striking he reference to s g <br /> the family <br /> detach curve n the fl t in ee <br /> 11 Councilman Overstreet asked <br /> Council proceeded in terms of types of <br /> housing In a condensed area would this also relate to density ad <br /> it did have a bearing on <br /> voting P men f ndm y with all Councilme Ys <br /> Brad <br /> Cattle said Roll ums called on <br /> Gipson,Overstreet and <br /> er, <br /> who voted <br /> s. <br /> d <br /> ii.1.'. h motIon Fails <br /> Roll uns called Councilmen <br /> mendment as originally stated with all votingvo g o,except nC Cthe ouncilmenLangus and Pope,who voted yes. <br /> Motion Faded <br /> familyMoved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman Pope, <br /> the total <br /> gross density alloble on buildable acreage dn the Shadow <br /> p nts not to ex 398,tkbetsing <br /> flwith bonus <br /> on-attached haus g <br />