Laserfiche WebLink
336 <br /> '.. <br /> July 15,1981 <br /> • <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-PROPOSED VACATIOx 52ND ST.-(CB 816-257) <br /> craig f theEngineeringDepartment, ProPooed <br /> vacation 1of 52nd 5 ween 2.1 and4 ethec <br /> an axe,of approximately 18,080a ewas within Conversations with R-titioners <br /> 2,single icated the proposed vacation bad beentng requs r-futurePresidentioi <br /> .• development. He said there are <br /> utilities within <br /> proposed <br /> • vacation ond would require an <br /> • <br /> r easement for reconstrueMion and• <br /> purposes. <br /> of Mr.Fullerton n lettd that the er <br /> y adc• b a ped <br /> • from the Lowell GCivic <br /> Association iell <br /> enial of the <br /> vacation or to laythepub _ arng until the comprehensive <br /> Plan is completed and formally adopted. then Planning <br /> to Department, <br /> who has <br /> been working with <br /> iitwdChris rad <br /> hthe nerg hood <br /> ora <br /> made r mo from Denniserickson,Planning <br /> . Director,stating that the memo <br /> had:adopted t <br /> followiingChris apol t wTee,eC= ouldnr Committee <br /> street <br /> M1h <br /> in <br /> esidential and riveifront areas of <br /> neighborhood f pots and entialopens ended corridors <br /> andis relit <br /> lic access areas..it would premature to grant Mr. hetric kson also <br /> y vacatihe on prior adothe ption <br /> ll Community Plan by <br /> ouncil.I <br /> iifpEuge e /feel <br /> bwerefelt <br /> otaimp�vedmight <br /> possibly used as a bufferd for ped and traffic <br /> zone.circulation <br /> • Councilman croft asked when the Lowell <br /> wet Planl <br /> would comd and Ms <br /> Dorado said it could be February of1982before it came <br /> to Council for <br /> rev <br /> She pointed <br /> . the applicants have beevery cooperative with the <br /> • <br />• g Department ata c neighborhoodand did agreerx it The <br /> ince i <br /> • <br /> end <br /> nof65 to time before theplanor vacation. <br /> is completed they havegdecidedet proceed. <br /> e an 51118 B.lyd,asked for thevacation. <br /> in ltd property <br /> b neighborhood <br /> a n bhom r rhe sain elf a thea e e fartry <br /> d like[ build a forme property. <br /> saidnhe understood the watern t Talley s his r apo s lily <br /> to correct. <br /> • Horace Sears, <br /> of property to the south of the proposed <br /> said he would <br /> to build a new house and felt it <br /> be an <br /> x \ <br /> the <br /> neighbotion rhood <br /> quiand arsome pointed <br /> time out <br /> waiting had <br /> or tdeferred <br /> applying <br /> the <br /> vache <br /> to be vacation, <br /> [ed. <br /> . Dennis Hacker,of 5315 S.Second, <br /> the <br /> d the <br /> Jo adrec d no future develop development because ofln <br /> of talked edrainageandsteel, <br /> slopes/ <br /> recommended <br /> • \ /e me.Sears pointed out there was a <br /> itch and separate catch basin for the <br /> water to run into. He felt there is no justifiable reason[o deny the <br /> {• <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br />