My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/08/26 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/08/26 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:35:31 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:35:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aoa <br /> August 26,1981 <br /> McClain,Pat Am language appearing t <br /> Condition all Councilman aroftI <br /> was <br /> felt that specifics could be addressed.and a1 e <br /> 11. said the Port,of Everett felt le <br /> pIt t could be <br /> worked out.Presideet fakes aShed about right Of to come anneal <br /> a Cattle,City Attorney ie is <br /> said the anPlicant had the right <br /> Council and ask for <br /> herfelt conditions were.un]ust. Gardner <br /> ry Ervine reported that Steve Burr,on behalf of the Port <br /> Neig <br /> borhood Association,had voiced a concern that Norton Avenue would <br /> have han increase in traffic continuing south from this proposed project. <br /> mr.Ervine pointed out dn X18.t included development of a ned <br /> and path between 16th and 21st Streets a e of Norton. <br /> Councilman Alacthe aoft felte e questioned <br /> ing and ending of the path wouldtb <br /> havwhere ide cross the street and go over of Norton had been considered tforbthe path,which ridge. He also might if t e <br /> safer. <br /> Councilman <br /> pointed out the Planning Commission had recommended the <br /> permitbe a et the c 1 s _ this r a <br /> tion. <br /> resulting regarding dirt and debris On City <br /> streets and alleys Condition h10 propect was too broad and should <br /> be narrowed to the specific area question. <br /> eBelford,Port of Everett Director,statedConditionthe lication. He suggested that a ed <br /> traffic Impactsd subsequent needed Improvements <br /> will be resolved by Parsons and/or the Port of Everett to the satisfaction <br /> of the City Traffic Engineer. He said at this time it was felt that the <br /> iYbike path was impractical because of safety reasons and the <br /> long-term <br /> f�.' leases on adjoining properties. <br /> ted minting t gra <br /> ConditionregardinglBdre bike path,and Mayor Moore <br /> k Y.. <br /> said h staff Council for their <br /> Stanley Stern,of Parsons Constructors,thanked <br /> alld consideration on this progect. He said they were <br /> in Condition alio that wording willing <br /> accept the C be'changed <br /> f avored the amendment suggested by Mr.Helf ord. <br /> Virginia to <br /> cautioned s of a project sucliah this <br /> against t o benefit o£additional s. <br /> R1 o <br /> moved <br /> by Councilman bangus,seconded by Councilman Gipson, the <br /> public M1 <br /> Roll was called odth all councilmen voting y ,escePt Councilman nape, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.