My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/09/16 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/09/16 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:30:06 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:36:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
9/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
432 <br /> I1 <br /> September 16,1981 <br /> she then <br /> Greater <br /> ted <br /> out the communication <br /> from Council <br /> Everett <br /> egardingpand said <br /> the <br /> Committee e <br /> had met and informally agreed t drelyclarified <br /> certainsoan the t <br /> Jim Co said they hax hat action reviewed <br /> proposed <br /> resolution nimportanttaken. They <br /> felt the elements the Growth <br /> management Policy <br /> d priorities He <br /> Council to pt the resolution. <br /> Councilman Michelsonwilling <br /> accept the <br /> an Council tconflictsfo w eater Everett <br /> he he could see no en Greater <br /> comments and <br /> 4Councilman Aldcroft then asked about the 1 others e sides the Council a Greater Eve and felt these also <br /> should <br /> President d n he total over- <br />, <br /> u[it was it Councilman <br /> Overstreet pointed o all testimony s part it. <br /> Mm or Councilman 5 changes to the seconded <br /> aMan Councilman red me <br /> b afore ex name September 19 <br /> Roll was called 1 Councilmen voting yes, <br /> oilman Pope, <br /> who was excused. <br /> Mction Carried <br /> Moved <br /> by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded byn Lang that minutes of <br /> t have been held,Council comments and conclusions,and <br /> comments, n a as an <br /> citizens to Management Report. <br /> r with all Councilmen voting yes,except Councilman Pope, <br /> who was excused. <br /> Motion carried <br /> by Cseconded by Councilman Overstreet,to <br /> suggestedCouncilman Aldcroft <br /> that an amendment be made a <br /> n 6 <br /> that set a 0 f P b i Pleme nnn <br /> r <br /> other issues not identified as the responsibility Planning <br /> administration's <br /> Commission as he felt this was <br /> responsibility to take it from this point. <br /> YCouncilman Overstreet said he felt a <br /> 90-day time r[ it offered ample time tfor action. tM1 the <br /> Jim Langus, draft had <br /> read'as soon sfpracticabletiand hperhappstthis wo,said the rdingshould be <br /> considered i place of the 90-d Para., <br /> President Baker ted an amendment that would address a status <br /> report if requested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.