Laserfiche WebLink
460 <br />) <br /> September'30,1991 <br /> WAIVER REQUEST-(Ce 919-411) <br /> Bold Lease Company,is requestingaariancErvine,of the Planninae from ER paying the City Gerry <br /> asking t the south fronting Lonhard for employee parking. The cg <br /> wExaminer <br /> aiver the matter on August 20,1581 and conditions as follows) <br /> 1 ended variance for fee <br /> um of five feet of landscaping <br /> be <br /> rovided along <br /> the e Lombardmfrontage with the e site do of a 34lfootpcurb n <br /> 2. That the <br /> Department apply <br /> prix ingWthe rigpermit <br /> the t o <br /> 3or <br /> either parking...Ploeding)lonollozes. <br /> , the roe sidewalk be surrounded by a 55 E een bel asPhalt Or concr Lombard <br /> o contain the plantings and exclude vehicles. <br /> /") 4. That the driveway entrance on Lombard be restricted to 29,5 be- <br /> 5 w n an a as That the applicant shall not k Individual l <br /> ua vehicles on the City <br /> right-of-way ora period longer than eight hou <br /> e said the applicant does not <br /> to <br /> AstrIp on nthe s ash thark there instead of 2. It was felt if landscape waived <br /> RF ,that car nthean paPP ca F landscaping urn. <br /> fee <br /> zuae <br /> of r gof-w y, churches. <br /> 51 F <br /> Ronald Bolding.reenting the ap c a e s xstrip <br /> ' f <br /> used redisplayyi g vehicles£ sale.o <br /> there were parking problems Lombard and any ad parkzng <br /> rt empand hY neighbor.evenOng. <br /> and church-goers on loyees during Sundaysthe ave thy <br /> of Cityright-of-way would be$500.00 per approximate coat or use <br /> yah • Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman bang.,to overrule <br /> the Hearing Examiner's recommendation in regard to requiring landscaping <br /> d to allow parking by <br /> rom00 uth p.m..weekdaysnting rand waiving payment- Wood Motors <br /> of <br /> ty <br /> President aker pointed out a letter received <br /> i Lombarg d,protesting waiver of the fee, from Milt Redwine,of <br /> 2609 <br /> President Baker said <br /> e had problems <br /> this issue as others have <br /> ing or green <br /> and could not been charged f think ofhother or yinstances with <br /> he fuse even for ee is <br /> r,to amend <br /> eMovmotion b bto eliminate waiving the y <br /> ng porPresident tion andscaping <br /> waive <br /> I' and Councilman <br /> y right-of-ways is amendment was entirely contrary <br /> to the motion as originally ade. <br />