My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/10/14 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/10/14 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:31:50 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:37:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/14/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
octoher 14,1481 <br /> PUBLIC NEARING-WESTRIDGE MOBILE HOAR PA.-(CB 819-392) <br /> the Berry Ervine, the Planning Department,reviewed background of <br /> it 1forMobile H 75th and hSt <br /> etween <br /> reets S.w. <br /> east of <br /> 76,the <br /> In and <br /> theons <br /> KEN Corp'a this was ttat t ,hat 9time sublet . <br /> anning Commission and <br /> a revised eite Plan <br /> proved which,was prepared after the sale of the <br /> violations ofedge Mobile Home Park. He said due to a rne.er of <br /> thers pproperty to a <br /> nd the City's mobile Home Park Code,this matter <br /> was reconsidered by the <br /> s lect to 20 conditionHearing <br /> r g Examiner in August,1981,and approved <br /> Since that time,several meetings have been held with pas.management <br /> and they have proposed some amendments and revisions to the Hearing <br /> he rin i held obat yithenHearing e <br /> Examiner arawould s. He stated they were tlikes pto resent them <br /> questionedhis time. <br /> • <br /> President Baker whether be considered as new <br /> testimony and would be the of the <br /> Examiner to take <br /> under considerationrather thanCouncil making decision, this <br /> could a some thesthat a considered new testvautt t e <br /> Brad <br /> Attorney, o o decide <br /> wished place onraheaHear ng Examiner and his realm of duties. <br /> Councilman <br /> by <br /> testimony <br /> de Council <br /> ouldbet y some of responsibilities c ge <br /> to the Hearing Examiner. • <br /> Moved by Councilman Atderodt,s that the <br /> PUhlic hearing be and Hearing ExanUner <br /> to discuss this matter and that the <br /> ked <br /> g tand that the applicant,opponents,staff <br /> Hearag Examiner sendahissrecommendations back to Council in this <br /> Bill Sullivan, representing the rapplicant,said he evisions <br /> be willing to sit down and discuss the object to the the <br /> blyculde eHearing proposed amendments that heconsidered testimony. <br /> Sandra Lewis, in the mobile <br /> said they object then he meetings <br /> tand that estimony theardadgteen told thereawouldabe no new or t without additionaldg <br /> P oposee revisions aefor ging hack toethe Hearmngtaxaminer. sthe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.