Laserfiche WebLink
szz <br /> r. <br /> November 12,1931 <br /> pOt un9tand teyy Sy p p I ge <br /> Doug Mcgall,Fire Chief, = e Be pPort <br /> the fve <br /> lana project. h asked the City Clerk to read Into he record <br /> Exh C ibit 1,which is on file in the City Clerk's Office,as far as then <br /> procedure in setting up the L.I.D.,letters received,notices sent, <br /> Also, s a letter of suPPort just received frdo <br /> l P the record roadrveExhibit a letter from Richard Duce,a letter <br /> node pte ers,showing support.Included III, <br /> from Dale M.gribble.NN as <br /> Exhibit IV,and a letter fromtTemp Baptist Chdrch pretesting,Included <br /> as Exhibit <br /> of the Engineering Department,reported in the <br /> notice <br /> bo <br /> hearing for the meeting tonight they had said a special m' aside in the IrublIc Council Chambers from 10:00-11:00 a.m. would <br /> end m. <br /> technicalqueregardistions <br /> Tuesday, <br /> November 10th for any persons having an,,d 1 11:00 and <br /> the yt P e 1 that <br /> someone <br /> bf had left <br /> b tern day evening,I eoPle <br /> uestions were <br /> Sher 1 on the Temple Baptist <br /> She property d a large assessment. <br /> Church <br /> whichh at the family hotrme as that <br /> wuld be <br /> lot <br /> deferredwere sold1 P <br /> f <br /> e <br /> bedeerr un ri such tem s rt were so y r the use chs . <br /> i yIn <br /> answer to a question by Councilman <br /> would <br /> e less <br /> xpensive to construct three lanes rather than five,Celia <br /> (( strong e biedethat right-of-way,even <br /> Ae total cost of the pro5ect would be less expensive,would <br /> allythouh hcost <br /> result in of e <br /> the three lane improve- <br /> ment would <br /> single family residential <br /> or a othat rail o enerate traffic <br /> Road.no traffic <br /> e need for down zoning obec have <br /> issued traffic,represent a future <br /> count in excess of a three lane <br /> € t nts y <br /> almost 605 because Of <br /> vacanreduced from$12 <br /> to a new assessment of about By About half the area.requirementst upon due to <br /> y awould need to be down zoned or cannot be (alreadyIThere developed) y <br /> ✓ distributionwould pay more per area rather than what was assessed.be an unfair <br /> existing <br /> three lanearea would have substantially reduced assesSMents already have three lanes. Access to their property woeld notbe <br /> and r=benefit mostly attributed to the sidewalks and belanes. <br /> Richard,Duoe said he opposed the proposal because of surface water <br /> drainage problems. de suggested if this were apprOVed.d h d nd he 1 acne work red <br /> Payment and exceptions made for certain few,li an ressince this is <br /> idents should helpupas or s an theximprovement.iae=, ore than just <br />