My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/12/09 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/12/09 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:35:44 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:40:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/9/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
repayment <br /> 1 40.0 <br /> December 9, <br /> h <br /> p ec6 1981 <br />{: Bill the budget committee <br /> • o pefor h <br />* tion of the fire station. Evergreen Way funds would be used for the <br /> constraction with repayment to begin from• chosen 8or Evergreen <br /> Nay.Coun bonds issued to <br /> the amount of$600,000. <br /> ] <br /> tr= <br /> nh <br /> ig ebnddaT an hve it exue y £oths <br /> awarded. <br /> calledenda Items with <br /> yes,exceptCouncilman AldcroftA,gwho was excused. 1 Councalm g <br /> 34 Motion carried <br /> 'f. REZONE DENIAL APPLICATION HEARING (CB 8111-464( <br /> Grant City Attorney,made referento his memo of =Decemberraised e won Novemrritten <br /> qal issues <br /> onsideration. . <br /> F; Council be <br /> when t hes consider the rezone and recommended that Council not <br /> thpetitioner before them for eyd the ahave the proper <br /> make a determination as to <br /> money agreeMent. <br /> He recommended 2 alternative causes of action( one would be to table <br /> until such <br /> me buyer and seller have resolved their dispute over te . <br /> sale of tbe property,and the other would be to deny the rezone and <br /> by ` allow t i cant process a rezone once they acquired ownership. <br />$.1(k.(3 Cithe <br /> anformation given in e was essentially L. sholdbasgiven before the Attorney felt �a <br /> ue tabled undisputes are settbetween t parties.a <br /> Councilmen h to ealxnaEd <br /> nat <br /> this Issue as he had a real estate ngoe <br /> agentInvolved it transaction.Councilman meetingstreet left the this <br /> 5Councilman Pope felt should whether <br /> r <br /> g.^ t the doctors e authorizedrepresentativesandapply <br /> for the rezone.T <br /> ','' Moved by Councilman Pope, <br /> ;C} icppera nd at a ted by <br /> Nassau bpro Councilman <br /> s for the <br /> nto g <br /> ansearneatpmq ytag purchaseproy reason ofperty from.the ntering a0zmun s. <br /> 511 Gra property,said they <br /> had withdrawn <br /> nt2n <br /> their request , t <br /> duly 13th <br /> he <br /> ctors had come to the <br /> anning Department <br /> 15, <br /> the <br /> houldrezone <br /> tapeloic questioned arezone <br /> en allowed to continue. She also pointed out this was a . <br />. � community <br /> mmunityVp property state at she did not s money <br /> agreemen..`� answer <br /> question b Councilman Michelson regarding le f <br /> property without bothuhusband an sgnatures,legality <br /> g c▪ replied she feltproperty could not heflisted without both <br /> r t : <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.