My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/12/23 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/12/23 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:36:42 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:41:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/23/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
583 <br /> 1 <br /> Be ..23,1gB1 <br /> 1 <br /> Pe@ltg®S1 BMW.-(CB 8113-535) <br /> Al'heal,Pubesreported that Voth Brothers Construction j <br /> Public <br /> is regutingthatoN be allowed to leave.a.sign.they installed is <br /> of the Swrett Pacific Hotel on again right-of-ram, #portion of <br /> front <br /> he sign is being blocked MY.large cedar tree BealiLay voold like m <br /> remove this tree- Shea notice that the.tree was <br /> City property and removed without en permission from <br /> City. City has a Jr water <br /> nidewlk along the aide main <br /> behind the <br /> 3'o£ sign hese: Smnld the removeditcould possibly <br /> ca▪use damage m this w City ordinances indicate that no sign <br /> support poles and brace or appurtenances of any sign,shall <br /> be placed on public property,mare <br /> to leave the sign i the-public right of-way enied t <br /> ru andMoth Brothers <br /> Construction he £orasd that the sign be relocated to a location on <br /> their property. <br /> Pope.seconded by Councilman Michelson,that Voth <br /> Brothers• hers be allowed m t me prsent location and t <br /> • area to lease amount to be calculated a a t <br /> dam pending as of of ease rates_ <br /> • nal them said that the tree probably should be mmred=and"placed <br /> ih.miothei a cost <br /> d <br /> e felt theboggle Voth Construction. <br /> A representative ofthesaid they would be happy m do this. <br /> Councilman Overstreet al if Mr.Neal was asking the Councilcharge <br /> said he£ City Attorney wouldhaveo <br /> the <br /> ordinance aid that thelordinace apecifi-ally states <br /> no signon -of-way,s city could not lease theproperty <br /> •• unless ordinance was changed <br /> ordinance used a a basis for • <br /> recommendation has a pp action and Mr../ones replied no. <br /> Moved rby C seconded nded by Councilman Michelson,to 1 <br /> lay action on this for 2 weeks and request theresearch <br /> the problem bland work with the hotel and Public Works Departmenpeople. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried i„ <br /> COUNCIL BIN NO.8112-509 <br /> he <br /> Pof AN amending(INC14CE amending the .Caph4D ofSecfor tiontiiontJ.of <br /> Ordinance-No.672-60 C 14.16.440(D).w <br /> Moved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman Gipson,that this <br /> s declarm nal reag o ill N and <br /> the City Clerk is erected 11 the roil for the final disposition <br /> of the ordinance. <br /> Rol,tall. Aye Michelson,Gipson,Aldcroft,Pope,Overstreet, <br /> Baker <br /> Nays: None Ordinance No.827-81 Adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.