Laserfiche WebLink
598 <br /> 7. <br /> December 30,1981 <br /> y. The issue of whethero deproperty <br /> with both bonding agreed where he <br /> n be <br /> included for protest purposes. copal Services <br />�+t, Sectionof Awc opined at one point where owns property it Ybe a <br /> petitioner <br /> for <br /> anLprl Supremeruling Casper vs. <br /> used construed <br /> Mr.Cattle said,in his opinion,City <br /> included for <br /> t purpose of determining total cost p purposes. <br /> The fourth issue of whether or not properties covered by <br /> a Power of <br /> developer develop by <br /> an LID must be considered. He said <br /> opiniononresulted, lid h s <br /> w have to b ermined,which be detrimental. <br /> All things considered negatively,1Y <br /> amount to approximately .9a, He felt it was very unlikaly that all <br /> d in the aandd thereforc recommended <br /> i' <br /> proceed with the Casino Road LSD. <br /> that Council <br /> protestsLIvcient and <br /> James <br /> Allendoe g protesting property <br /> oaa <br /> 1 points t <br /> s <br /> of view. epointeda tyoehad a <br /> y <br /> protested the D with possibility f more out-of-town <br /> been able to have been ed. listen <br /> kind of public edian figure of <br /> 57.64 protest, <br /> the Davis letter would put the percentage <br /> t �.. over stating favored <br /> rescinded <br /> letter indicates that Mr.Davis letter of <br /> December2nd was one of protest. <br /> Mr.Allendoerfer also questioned the telephone call by a City staff <br /> member to Mr.Davis indicating his property would be downzoned should e <br /> {6 fail. Brad <br /> Cattle replied the call <br /> s made for clarification of <br /> ap Mr.Davis'letter on a proposed LID <br /> l eea t <br /> A.er IioP thoubinto theeproper y weer i test matters ea the <br /> Moved bseconded byCouncilman <br /> LIDthe protests for Casino Road A709insufficientand that e City <br /> D. <br />¢` F intends nx <br /> adlcwas called with on,who were all Councilmen voting yes,exCouncilmen <br /> Motion Carried <br /> NCIL BILL NO.8112-539 <br /> ceDSECOND READZNG: <br /> e City of Everett <br /> as ORDINANCE amending <br /> Zoning <br /> afl <br /> provided byEverett Code,Title Ord.No.3572. <br /> Rezone 2. <br /> zi4-81 L /Rlic2era aha Nassau. <br /> 3 ' On motion the meeting adjourned 5 <br /> Reaa and pproved as Print <br /> President <br /> 1 <br /> �'S�u <br />