Laserfiche WebLink
18 <br /> January 20,1982 <br /> Councilman Overstreet then asked w the d he said people <br /> ppapp6n,to make up for this lack, ht net be any <br /> training,but it was the extra hands to e to hep n the.emergency tha..he <br /> felt was necessary - <br /> Councilman Michelson asked what increase in cost there would be for <br /> transportiha <br /> f McCall said they ad not an a any increase <br /> in cost a allRoll was . <br /> cars to transport in an <br /> called on the motion for Fire emergency situation effective February ,1982,with o ncrlmen <br /> voting Yea( <br /> Motion Carried <br /> PROPOSED.L.I.D.4710 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM WORKSHOP <br /> Celia Strong reported <br /> P creating L.I.D. Code, <br /> #710, Everektall <br /> yory hh <br /> Orf tincludeda <br /> little petition that <br /> T <br /> Titan'.filedas <br /> circulated and roper majority Ttion <br /> MallAssociates-Everett was accepted by City Cotmcil on Decemberociates3O,1981eaNormally the <br /> h <br /> petitioners are not allowed to withdraw teir nams once a petition has <br /> been accepted. This particular petition contains a clause that reserves <br /> ght to withdraw <br /> signatures if the estimated <br /> cost exceeded to the petitioner the 910,000exceed this amount. <br /> „rr e initial environment17-acre site <br /> Between the time of <br /> and the time City tCtTitanic Associates)accepted the po rthe nl <br /> original proposal either losor gave up their interest in the 12-acre site.The <br /> site is now owned by a partnership <br /> represent, <br /> There has <br /> see filed involving <br /> owner( eAssociates) <br /> and the new owners represented caate aPPears to involve the environmental review nThe action <br /> However( here <br /> awes not aPPear to be any action involving the City. <br /> At a meeting on January 15,1982,called to discuss the L.I.D.with the <br /> property owners,the representative of Harmon 6 octes representing <br /> the 17-acre site indicated Urat it was the position of S , <br /> that as a condition of their continued suloPert ci the L.J.,the Cit, <br /> of Everett must withdraw a condition contained on the environMental <br /> review that is as a resultSoficts access to the 17-acre site. The restricted access <br /> a9Whil <br /> determineis desirable and the access restrictions are <br /> looked into,it is <br /> not possible to <br /> that would resolvet the hearing, <br /> ot <br />