Laserfiche WebLink
April 7,1962 <br /> There were 2 letters received in favor of the rezone and also a ' <br /> petition-opposing the rezone. <br /> applicant,Rougies Ferguson, my <br /> wished to use'S. Landscaping l be 1 Ast ttorney <br /> tets l/2for business PsrPoses I <br /> will be residential <br /> and will meet minimum <br /> . Brant weed,Assistant <br /> ntas that orney,sbasresolve <br /> the spot zoning Issue basis for the denial Council should so <br /> was ethe <br /> • Examiner. <br /> mrerus <br /> did not feel Council should ea 1 <br /> igeon address whether this s <br /> eealdte° e. a Evergreen-Wag <br /> aewide strip. <br /> ineighbors <br /> if this application,70 voiced <br /> . in his interpretation of spot zonin. Illegal spot zoning would ! <br /> r <br /> he felt the Hearing Examiner was wrong in the law in this case . <br /> have to be is or the compehensive Plan,which is not 1 <br /> se <br /> the <br /> unccihnapply aere.Stephenson asked if thenoticedfter the violation rms P <br /> licant came to the City ie <br /> edmP filtration <br /> denied. informally <br /> Fleming e storage,however. <br /> which a a violation. <br /> Councilmanon pointed out the Comprehensive Plan has <br /> t, been in spute forquisome time <br /> and there are more questions <br /> than answers relative to the plan. <br /> Councilman <br /> why he net agree <br /> withthe <br /> spot zoning and he• epie n zdifferent <br /> from and <br /> nt with the classification of surrounding <br /> land and <br /> in <br /> ordance with th <br /> Comprehensiv <br /> rezone would benefit the co ityeas a whole. a elan. This <br /> Jim Hawkins, Wall Street Building and attorney for nx <br /> and Mrs. <br /> reported <br /> complained a he activity <br /> taking t written a letter toathe inconsistent ning. They aCity, which <br /> application for rezone was submitted. riy t ne <br /> inZtx suggesting <br /> tpg <br /> included. <br /> nh <br /> Snot lots nit issue. Approximately a 70 x 75'section of the <br /> be.used for storage of tire casings and would be <br /> utilizing the narrow driveway between the Wagnes's OToFert,''''F t <br /> access to the <br /> orage <br /> The Hearing Examiner ruled this 1 <br /> it the health,safety and welfare n <br /> of the coparticular use mmunity,only`r.area.the rezone,the neighbors mes.uld However,However,activelyif nape€tang <br /> T concur with uP conditionsconclusions and .. <br /> reCOMMendatitheon6 Hid Examiner's nin <br /> Hhe eron.. din9t,uesand adopt Resolution <br /> No.2075. . <br />