My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/05/12 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/05/12 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:40:29 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:49:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
5/12/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 12,1982 <br /> uncilman-Longus arrived at this time. <br /> Roll w called on the Consent Agenda Items with all Corm .men 00010' <br /> yes,a 0000 Councilman Longus, iw abstained from voting.c <br /> Motion Carried <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-S00NOVIEW PHO-(CB 825-196) <br /> Dennis• <br /> Gregoire,of the Planning Department,explained the applicant, <br /> Nohcoast Properties'and lnveetments of Seattle,is requesting final <br /> PPR and Preliminary Plat approval for 22 lots with 22 single family <br /> attached unite <br /> in <br /> eight clusters o c <br /> a 4.3 e e located est of <br /> Glenwood Avenue and south of 50th 5 Access is)to be off <br /> Glenwood on a public road with 50'of right-of-way,28'of vin' <br /> and with sidewalk o side,50'radius turnaround <br /> tGommiseion t'witha and- <br /> caped c Three public hearings were held before he Planning <br /> who recommended that approval be granted subject to 16 <br /> conditions. Theonly change i theproject since originally submitted <br /> e the request for preliminarynplat approval in addition to final PHO <br />• approval. <br /> • <br />• Councilman Aldcroft asked about the concerns <br /> raised regardingdrainage, <br /> visibility and sloughing of upper land,and Mr.Gregoire said the <br /> drainage problems have been worked out and a rock barrier designed to <br /> combat the erasion problem. <br />' One of the previous owners platted the property into 18 legal building <br /> lots. The project as now proposed would allow the City better <br /> control a here would be only o owner, a opposed to individual <br /> Lowners. <br /> Councilman.Michelson was concerned about possible liability if the • <br /> proposed rockery retaining wall should slip. He <br /> also asked about <br /> s <br /> tification of surrounding property owner and Mr.Gregoire said <br /> they had been notified by letter that this would be heard • <br /> today by Council. Councilman Michelson saidmatter <br /> several people were <br /> planning to attend but w n t the meeting. He asked that the <br /> matter be postponed one week to allow additional public input. <br /> President'Pope gg s[d that people mighth h ugM1this <br /> matter would be discussed 1 because f the 9:00 a.m.scheduling <br /> for Item#1 He said testimony would continue to be heard. he <br /> public hearing would then be closed and would be reopened again <br /> d action takenafter the final item on today'sagenda. <br /> Councilman Stephenson inquired about the slope grade and Mr. <br /> Gregoire repp0rted i was between 15-]0:and Development <br /> would m thea:goer slopes of 300 toO o r The <br /> Steep Slope Ordinance would govern in grades of 15%and Over. <br /> President Pape felt m should be taken to protect buyers as <br /> well as neighbors surrounding this project. <br /> Mayor Moore said there i construction on steeper slopesthan this <br /> and the y had the toolto insure this was done properly. He <br /> pointed out the Planning Commission felt this was a.good project. <br /> Councilman Gipson spoke in favor of the project as befn8 0700 tot <br /> Shot would allow the City proper control. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.