My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/05/12 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/05/12 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:40:29 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:49:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
5/12/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18] <br /> May 12,1982 <br /> Councilman Langur arrived at this time. <br /> Rg 11 w called o Agenda I fth all C Cflmen voting <br /> except Councilman Lngus,who abs[ainedwfrom veing. <br /> Matron Carried <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-SOUNCUIEW PRD-(CB 825-196) <br /> Omnia Gregoire,of the Planning Department, <br /> explained the applicant, <br /> rthcoast Properties and InvertmentsofSeattle,farequesting final <br /> PRD and PreliminarPlat approval for 22 lots with 22 sngle family <br /> attached units in eight clusters an a 4.3 acre site located east of <br /> Glenwood Avenue andsouth of 50th St.S.W.. Access is to be off <br /> Glenwood on a public road with 50'of right-of-wa28'of paving <br /> and with sidewalk on PCU1CCe.50'radius turnaround with a and- <br /> ped center. Three public hearings were held before he Planning <br /> Commission <br /> entwho recommended that approvalbegranted subject to 16 <br /> conditions. The only change i the project s originally submitted <br /> is the request for preliminary plat c <br /> plat approval in addition to final PRO 17i <br /> approval. <br /> Councilman Aldcroft asked about the concerns raised regarding drainage, <br /> visibility and sloughing of upper land,Sand Mr.Gregoire said the <br /> drainage problems have been worked out and a rock barrier designed to '. <br /> combat the erosion problem. <br /> One of the previous owners platted the property into <br /> o 18 legal building <br /> n <br /> lots. The project as now proposed would allow the City better <br /> control as here would be only one owner,as opposed to individual <br /> lot owners. <br /> Councilman Michelson was concerned about possible liability if the <br /> proposed rockery retaining wall should slip. He also asked about .I <br /> notification of surrounding property ownersand..Gregoire said <br /> en <br /> they had benotified by letter that this <br /> a <br /> m would be heard <br /> today by Council. Councils.rn Michelson saidseveral ral people were <br /> planning to attend but were not at the meeting. He asked that the �I <br /> matter be postponed one week to allow additional public input. <br /> President Pape suggested that people might have thought this <br /> matter would be discussed later because of the 9:00 a.m.scheduling <br /> for Item$1. He said testimony would continue o be heard,the <br /> public hear_ng would then be closed and would be reopened again <br /> and action taken after the final item on today's agenda. <br /> Councilman Stephenson inquired about the slope grade and Mr. <br /> Gregoire reported it was between 15-30%ado a Oeve"TNt <br /> geld note cur near twe steeper slopes of 30%and ower. e <br /> Steep Slope Ordinance would govern grades f 15%and over. <br /> President Pope felt measures should be taken to protect buyers as <br /> well as neighbors surrounding this project. <br /> said thereafs c ction on steeper slopes hon this ,�jl, <br /> pointed outy had the[ogle t s Chia was done properly. He 7 <br /> painted out the Planning Commission efelt this was a good project. <br /> =an <br /> Gipson spoke in favor of the project as befog the one <br /> the[would allow the City prop ex control. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.