Laserfiche WebLink
May 26,1982 <br /> Be t further moved that a bid call be a of t l <br /> one new 18-passenger . Bids t v n i <br /> 2.00 pat.,.July 1,1982. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> LEASE AGREEMENT-(CB 025-2431 <br /> II�S4Moved by Councilman Michelson,seconded by Councilman A <br /> dcre <br /> ft <br /> , <br /> to <br /> authoriseexecute lease agreement tAVfibr <br /> Resources f r lease ofpopertlocated s 36th <br /> and Eastof Burlington <br /> uilangto Northern terminal ds,execution <br /> to pending <br /> gpublction of conditions of the lease as Per <br /> Section 15.8othe City Charter.pC9. Gary Friend,of 2605 McDougal, <br /> spoke against the lease <br /> because <br /> he <br /> tinResource's tudk9and d e <br /> hishemettheyhled tpe oblgationty <br /> assumed wthey to fromEEnvironmental Rubber. They owe <br /> him over$1,000and have not paid nor made any arrangements to take <br /> cart o <br /> this. <br /> Councilman Overstreet eked if anyone had delved in.the a <br /> of the corporation President Pope commented that their <br /> credit <br /> was approved by are <br /> suggested i his.lease od <br /> approved it not b ex tea <br /> until some arrangement bas been made with M id topayhim. <br /> Duane representing Simpson reported he had attended nded a <br /> stinPearson, where the lease discussed. <br /> were drafted <br /> doupmfor the newleaseto ensure performance. Be said <br /> • reposed included a umber of these n <br /> heepainted o r portant y i a forcement. suggestedvthat <br /> Rubber Resource the <br /> a performances bond t r a where <br /> additionatiresicould be brought in other vthan Bas specified <br /> in the lease. <br /> oeaaNeaan <br /> Michelson questioned whether this type of bond could be <br /> Mayor Moors a felts d owners have done an excellent job <br /> since taking so r e companynan ying to solve the prdblemms. <br /> Fred a legal counsel f Burlington Northern Railroad, <br /> reported illegal e property. He ilei <br /> they failed the <br /> atermination agreem d <br /> a iprogress. <br /> s. Ifth11 not <br /> meet thea any <br /> but <br /> BurlingtonNorthern be extension <br /> t <br /> encroachment be removedatRubber Resource' expense. How- <br /> . <br /> ever,he <br /> o- <br /> he said whelfelt rthis would not be n ted <br /> rCity should considerrequiring a performance and also <br /> that e adjoining property o should be ardResources.They would <br /> willingtocooperate with the City and Rubber sour es. be <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br />