Laserfiche WebLink
83 Y <br /> ti <br /> duly 21,1482 <br /> ouhty reviewed excerpts fhCouncil mina smeetings, <br /> including irregular boundaries,some ofthe sewer contracts, im- <br /> provements, <br /> Planning <br /> gDepanent felt thhat the consensus fthe <br /> , <br /> Council htaffshould not boundary the <br /> annexation <br /> guideline. be reviewed how the u area had been <br /> included in <br /> t <br /> councilman complimented the <br /> s <br /> l <br /> e <br /> t <br /> e <br /> r <br /> and.e ns and he said he felt very, nmfortable <br /> witbti he <br /> annr ta n or improving l Planet <br /> and <br /> uWk m conversationwith <br /> Pblic cnepartnnt an yhatmc Planning <br /> S.E.are included in 6-year ata a <br /> uilaunded project. <br /> nelth , me thntCoonar • <br /> oc -xvdofa e project indication rsoohe <br /> are being c considered n pCounty ,however,that <br /> their Councilmay be w ingtc talk about joint Project with the CvtY <br /> to improve <br /> 100th St.S.E. <br /> President Pope <br /> red t citizens could forma Li improve <br /> streetthe and Councilman Overstreet felt that this wax the time i <br /> t • <br /> should be decided whether therewas going to be <br /> Doughty quoted from the annexation policy#18 which read"the two key I1� <br /> accepted i City a safety an on <br /> g <br /> - <br /> term <br /> tenance.. He said <br /> ts <br /> th <br /> ntiet1 • <br /> minimize m maintenance proble <br /> ms. veimprovmentst 100thSt.D.E.will be eededbut adre sedebythe it' s t i.. <br /> t <br /> ordinance a laeNumber the policy read""theCity should <br /> minimum,analyze thessafety and nong-termmaintenance f <br /> all streetswithin an proposed for anteshould receive <br /> report m maintenance cost ninea Public W espectely' id further Pj4.i <br /> �. <br /> analysis of the streets <br /> conducted <br /> t <br /> ducted prior o the City Council <br /> consideration of the 16# <br /> He then said the mechanism should be that those eople benefiting ftom <br /> arid <br /> the improvement acausing the problem should share eq ally d. <br /> the co kingthe improvement . <br /> He pointed. a Councilthey <br /> lreduce he annexation <br /> o <br /> • by deleting[h .H.,although theeisa reliminary plat on <br /> this <br /> property,but it couldprobably ghworked out with the County. A <br /> second option would be eliminate the"P"portion o which <br /> • would allow <br /> all of the Mrs.Wright's property to be.nneX.al <br /> The third alternative would bet a <br /> eeimfn to ell of Mr Wright's <br /> property ntheproperty to he east of hers. <br /> u.oilcanGi on then that the r show h listened to <br /> meeting n <br /> of l e last which he h and a also <br /> talked the Planning staff regarding the annexation. <br /> • Gilman bee n felt tnat all of Mra a property should b „ <br /> allpo v[should be left in Ne County.that it wasn't c rete <br /> to split it. - <br /> • empson,a real estate broker,said he hadfv linterests in <br /> th <br /> f e property i theproposed <br /> n <br /> annexation. Heaeai theto amex <br /> sewer problems in a area he felt the 0 ly solution was <br /> to the City. <br />