My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/08/11 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/08/11 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:43:34 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/11/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
319 <br /> August 11,1982 <br /> serry then s _thatthe_Catnegie_9hilding _ <br /> will.be . <br /> Eretainervine one n the a <br /> amended as with <br /> all o r buildings removed except for <br /> Employment <br /> SaityBll Hearingamigerhea <br /> hearing <br /> on July <br /> ,and <br /> thaaexltbsubject <br /> 23 conditions. City enpettittionedfoended Conditions <br /> regarding <br /> vm[neneisseetyrinoneba r that hvaand issuance of vrng <br /> petitid. etron be <br /> ry arpicnds Condition <br /> a <br /> te <br /> and Lombard alley will signed£1Oakes only. <br /> saidt.e area,not to eliminateminimize <br /> pubto lic access <br /> e <br /> Major ss points to the proposed facilitywill be on Wall <br /> and Oakes <br /> President PO,commented on Senvor center and 5 ueingpproject.roximity f the facv to the <br /> Fred Printing, <br /> a had in t <br /> jail being built adjacent <br /> dleft <br /> tohis business, uChuesteddboth <br /> aocesse <br /> s <br /> to s premisebe eftooeen a also tnal <br /> einstalleas Pecific a Lombard. He alsoaskedthat the alley <br /> remain <br /> -way. <br /> tea t reviewed t possibility of <br /> s lightatthe d Lombard and p <br /> e intersection matter is dobe t determined if e <br /> need it adoes ta and YincludedThis inthe cdiscussion 1 ithrth u <br /> reenrding utilities and s improvements. Thee Everett n Housing <br /> nu dty ha also voicedconcerns about nincreased rafficSo <br /> Councilman Michelson e <br /> ut taken t antiport <br /> f the County,said they would only <br /> use the Oakes Street access. <br /> by....cab bbccrcbt,seconded b Councilman leeet,tos <br /> 9 sat the is scan tie m Permit cone Wien the e Hearing Johnson nor a <br /> finings,,Senior <br /> Citizens <br /> can <br /> recommendations et cas on file in th city <br /> Clerk's Office. <br /> Gilman 0 ked M if he felt co with <br /> Nie and he cepliedey s longCa alley w L b rd <br /> nos and that traffic dud not back up o black hva ss on om e <br /> ked if et w determined aalighn was needed <br /> a Wacific a om awou d t as a hubltc ring held, <br /> andohruce said this w a poasibilitd if t t wa e <br /> Involved.C 0 loran a street pointed O t Ne nIm=b db <br /> uncal bl light <br /> could be Nearing ou ilea's to er <br /> and oma he the fight d be included.if. co nc loran would <br /> be it at then"sa dihevwoula be in favor ou the.motion rfthiauintentwould be <br /> recognized. <br /> Harriet n <br /> Olson was concerned that the Senior Center parking lot would <br /> be taken over by theC Coon in the unty. She also felt the City should be <br /> given <br /> tg since itsmadeaa large contributionttostheafa £Ccility.o ip <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.