My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/09/22 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/09/22 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:46:13 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:55:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
9/22/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
370 <br /> September 22,1982 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-(CB 829-384) <br /> FINAL <br /> N ORDG <br /> ANORDINANCE theZ Map of theCity of <br /> Everett City <br /> provided byBEverett <br /> n Municipal de,Title <br /> 8hena) <br /> 19,Ord.sNo.3572 s ended. (Rezone 49-82,Marc <br /> Dennisrezo <br /> e under <br /> Sound This <br /> ws 4 t parcel <br /> lying <br /> southwest Southwest Gregoire announced this <br /> Planninga toe f first <br /> lying s of <br /> the end wa Avenue. Theac els public h rings <br /> on Jul 133.and 27thand recommended a of the applicant,re- <br /> quest to <br /> rezone£from RB .single-Family Sp Medium <br /> Levelo <br /> ofthesite. he staffact c concurs <br /> specifying u standards <br /> site s designated <br /> r puse lanned industrial parkinthe Southwest Ever Plan.aTheaac <br /> f this site.will be reviewed by the Planning Commission an <br /> Council t the appropriate t t applicant requested this <br /> vi <br /> workshoptos his concern on two conditionsofthe Planning <br /> Commission's approval. <br /> Gregoire• then pointed out the process for the rezone and project <br /> development. He sid first was the Comprehensive Plan in whim he <br /> Planning <br /> CommissioandCityCouncil had a part. The second was <br /> the rezonei h a contract which they had before the Council today <br />• and which had been approved by the Planning Commission with 25 <br /> conditions. N would be the site plan view,which also encomp seed <br />'.� t Planning Commissionor Hearing Examines and the Cil. e <br /> fourth two taffe te buildingplanthefifththese were construction <br /> onT <br /> and n ix occupancy permit. All three of the by <br /> ite <br />( the City <br /> aPope thought there should be a 5-1/2 after construction on- <br />{tII <br /> President <br /> he City Council could participate and see if all of <br /> the conditions d been followed. Jim Iles,Assistant <br /> nthCity Attorney, <br /> said the Council's jurisdictionwouldstop at number <br />�'. <br /> site plan review, any[ further would be followed up by the a <br /> staff.Co.cilman Gips asked what the Council could coif they did h <br /> 5-1/2 and <br /> foundth t thenitions tmeta President Pop <br /> e <br /> felt that the Council could refuse to allow the ohcupancypermit t <br /> be issued. <br /> d what <br /> as <br /> um <br /> Councilman <br /> 11 fcturing and or Planned <br /> Industrial he difference canis Gregoire <br />( therewas actually <br /> Paned I ark a regpeise rees plies <br /> o difference.Everett had <br /> dnt f <br /> uses in <br /> use play£n Southwest zone. d u a those a rmitted <br /> ossa in Medium Manufacturing <br /> pointed outthat this time had been latted fox single <br /> family homes,but because of the noise factor from Paine Field,this <br /> had not been permittee. <br /> Stephenson thenaskif the developer would be allowed <br /> Councilman the vegetation and d Gregoire said this had been removed aboutre <br /> three years ago and,in answer Councilman Stephenson's question, <br /> Xreplied that <br /> see h received the proper permits to do this. However, <br /> 41 <br /> it had caused me drainage problems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.