Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 402 <br /> raj <br /> October 20,1982 <br /> �.t ane Fluke had b developed ere were no strict drainage regulations <br /> sincebut that[ laws had been passed and there was better <br /> ;` a <br /> enforcement this type of problem o <br /> uncilman Stephenson then asked if Mr.Freudenberg had a problem,end <br /> Mathias replied that did h a problembutthea n where <br /> ere his <br /> j. houseconstructedhwaston veryunstablesop and the h had been <br /> • built very losto the stream <br /> Charles Newcombe,of 412 Baker Drive,said he was a member of the <br /> committee and ked for <br /> over o r 2 years on this pen. He felt there were <br /> robably individual pointsoblected to by individual members of the <br /> committee but as a whole they felt this as a goad plan and recommended <br /> review <br /> adoption. He supported the eve y 5years anfelt possibly e <br /> should be reviewed annually. felt main <br /> h <br /> a n point oft a plan w <br /> ;kµ4 that it establishes drainage controls before the property is developed. <br /> andk Munnich, <br /> 4704 Meat Gleamy.,a member of the Growth Mpnagmant <br /> Coouncil t also a member he sena len Committee, <br /> Council to adopt he plan. <br /> azel Haugen,a resident en Muki1te0 800106860,wa8 very 0oncerned about <br /> the dxalnage problem in Powder Mill Gulch. <br /> �'. Ed Mueller,of 5202 Sound,said this problem wag comms throughout this <br /> area. <br /> ,N 1 = George Newman,o£4325 Seahurst,felt the plan should be adopted. <br /> R r ' President Pope a ked if anyone further wished to speak on this resolufn <br /> and no one replied. <br /> jir owed by Councilman 210000ft,seconded by Councilman Stephanion,to clo <br /> Ne public hearing. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Iv <br /> ped b C lman engus,a onded by Councilman Stephenson.he adopt <br /> i'� Resolution x0C121'!9 as£ollowsg <br /> � i t Drav EnT asvneoPlang the <br /> South Everett <br /> 2.; nage H� <br /> k}" WHEREAS,it is in the Interest of the citizens o£Everett <br /> t o be <br /> protected from flooding and potential damage from surface wa water <br /> noff <br /> Ffrom new and existing development;and <br /> i.. REAS.It is in the be t long range Interest of the present and <br /> future citizens of Everett to preserve a maintain exis ng natural <br /> drainagewaye which provide visual and natural system benefits for the <br /> 2.202168 <br /> {1 t <br /> community.WHEREAS the City undertook the development o a Compre <br /> Drainage Plan andental Statement <br /> WHEREAS,theCitydeveloped an Environmental Impact 8 <br /> identifying the impacts f h a plan.� <br />