Laserfiche WebLink
0."�•.f,.?5,.. 396 <br /> d October 30,1983 <br /> Inclity Tax on o theexceptionally electrical rates over <br /> ceptvovally rapid growth i <br /> the last three years,the revenue derived f separticular tutili for <br /> 9.x to so increased proportionately. In have <br /> calleda$6to b00zetermvned,uction ib this tax will be£or pre entad[ 1 before end <br /> yy oftthe y 983. o Cspeci rotes have <br /> GamblingTaxo out ave e have also <br /> y addition t the utility t roll hack o£$$4400,000,h ambiguous <br /> k j re he ambling t by over$100,000. hough t <br /> language f the State law governing gambling taxes remains a clouded <br /> ="h<' are nolongerin leopardy of an adverse finding byour <br /> auditors.e <br /> gReal Estate ExciseTax <br /> satxcise tax of o e <br /> -quarter of one percent on zea <br /> ll' lestat <br /> e <br /> transactioestate <br /> ws authorized by State law in 1962. The City has chosen <br /> oimplement optional tax at time. xwmains a n <br /> e <br /> source n the ineed 6with the current <br /> .' money <br /> mathe housng market in particular,w don recommend <br /> ' this taxinguthority b invoked. <br /> lee''. <br /> Recreation <br /> C _ $ n balancing budget,t technical requirement is o nothing more <br /> Parks <br /> p he to ailableen one of r <br /> p of <br /> 'mating ethis tp to match he we know thess.e rttfor can orae <br /> who face thus task each year,a prorate <br /> 0 be excetionally frustrating. a great may hopes a expectation <br /> ki unrealized,goal,slug by the wayside,narogramsdr marlin at he <br /> j+ } go <br /> stage nly. for <br /> because economicresources eelvmrteaerhaps <br /> his is for u he bent,f only the worthy ideas emerge,surfacing <br /> 1:o above all them their own strengths and <br /> merits. to <br /> IThe most difficult aspect <br /> inlncingthe <br /> budget <br /> is <br /> actually <br /> strong new program w faced hcompetition b my <br /> but <br /> /4 pavprgrsa those wehome offered for man],years. at <br /> some point time,wet faced with the cal choice between long- <br /> },7,hYkx standing aero and new more innovative nes that promis <br /> e a <br /> greater <br /> return h community's investment. <br /> ` Such is hewith Parks Recreation bud The time has com <br /> takefresh atentirebreaking <br /> every program, <br /> i examining h critically, <br /> pdf necessary,mking choices about <br /> the contined exvtf all 1ervices. This is no longera <br /> management issue,it has b policythat will,without <br /> ions call Co it s cinregardo the giantitye and <br /> question, <br /> recreational ac that are affordable the immediate <br /> and long-tens future. Theta trade-offs are first b Parks <br /> the rem City s d then within Parka between <br /> and recreation; r of run a longer ignore the <br /> tremendouefin- <br /> vestment in thephysicalassets off the Pa s, ono be responsible eunaist o 0 <br /> Paining t If w te c <br /> there quality of o more than 600y9cres ofopark uland,am n <br /> and operations o more than'l0 buildings, we m esponsiblytro <br /> yr' allocate,a the expense of otherservices,enough funds t sustain <br /> k',,. this physical plant in sound working order. <br />