Laserfiche WebLink
461 1.... <br /> 1 <br /> November 24,1982 <br /> j <br /> president P tuft announced that the n agenda item. <br /> public hearing on the1983 budget, be heardasthe lasagenda <br /> item this morning. <br /> • <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO.8211-488 <br /> SECOND READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE <br /> N� 8amending Sections 3 and 5 of <br /> Ordinance a amended by O 1 <br /> for Fund no. Water <br /> 713-80 and 813-81 �dervvog nue <br /> 336: Res v No.6 <br /> ' COUNCIL BILL NO.8211-497 <br /> FIRST.READING: <br /> e <br /> AN 0 regulating g f Ordinance No.317 <br /> and amending Section 2 of Ordinance No.31)-]4 <br /> IEMC 3.44.030). <br /> COUNCIL <br /> SILL <br /> ILLDINO. <br /> 8211-490 i <br /> • FIRST <br /> don AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No.]]9-81 <br /> which provides for the regulation of for-hire <br /> vehicles in the City 0£Everett. <br /> • <br /> ADD-ON-PROPOSED SAIL CONTRACT-WE 0211-499) <br /> City A reported.there had been a meeting <br /> with amenbers of the tSnohomish County Council,Willis Tucker <br /> and C staff concerning the i the jail fees <br /> should be. The discussed incremental cos of housing <br /> prisoners,bookingvfees tand ttransportationeco a The County <br /> cognised but chose n h the several of these <br /> e issues. A compromise Of$44.00 was suggested tothe <br /> equate t <br /> If the ityaccepted the County's proposal,i o <br /> an increase o approximately 1898 or the first day. <br /> Cushman,Finance 0 reviewed computations comparing <br /> • Bill current fees charged andthenewfeea being proposed. !, <br /> Thiswouldinclude a$20.00 booking efee,uanuadditional$22.00 <br /> for a full day,bringing the total to$64.00 for the first day. <br /> CoUncilman Aldcroft said he was not in favor of the City operating <br /> its own]vl. <br /> asaiu t Ounty had men honed a County-Cie jails but <br /> ChisOvrould ca se problems theythave a different bas <br /> Mayor Moore expressed c rn about Everett's itiaens being <br /> certainoamounof tax dollars is allocates or law <br /> enforcement a taxed twice. A the citirenewould be paying again with the per <br /> diem fees charged everyone. <br /> 1 <br />