My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/12/08 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/12/08 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:59:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/11111111 <br /> 488 <br /> December 8,1982 <br /> said Nabi S Son s hta svnassaefd alternate solutions and the <br /> Mayor has en:Aingeon he a tax credits.• pl <br /> said 2 fundamental thing to remember i Council <br /> disc eeedethe -1/2million dollar ccontribution ms additional sales <br /> s a commitment made on Jne 2nd. However,at t that time the there <br /> ewas no given the information athat athe jail <br /> ere goingtoup as dramaticallas they h The proposed <br /> fees=epfaent an82% rather than ttht 6-78as anticipated fees <br /> v coat living increas07 108 suggested City ea <br /> jail fund with a portion of the 1-1/2 million t Pay increase in fess <br /> combined with general <br /> alfunds monies. <br /> e as Thhave1820 saying ch094/daend <br /> Cou <br /> nowthey unclear is sayingtthis.� d <br /> Cushman $49.00 <br /> said the$44.00 is my i thexe <br /> number the Executive branch o <br /> using based on 1982a x and the$49.00is based o <br /> usinthe unumbeof prisoners,including work release. <br /> pointlarger <br /> ed out there has8 been thing in writing from the County. <br /> Mayor said the County contained a umbar of non-enterprise <br /> Moore said <br /> as air aia and h concernedabout <br /> Everett' citizens airport, <br /> a fair share tof e costs. Thefees mentioned <br /> oefdar az o based completely honest statistics.TSin d City <br /> woubechargedthe same a other cities,it is felt theyare double <br /> dipping. <br /> Councilman Michelson suggested hinvestingithe 1-1/2:11110ncansiperation <br /> the a else as t mak.vng an on <br /> of them contribution. <br /> cilmsa Stephanion saido us wa apposed t Neox ropesed b1 the <br /> Co my a also apposed L ingaNe 1-1/2 mil s leverage. <br />�,.. Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman Dingus,to <br /> submitanoffer to the County f jail of$38.00 per y as it <br /> proportionately relates to other es o alternative to <br /> reserving <br /> the sum f$553,241 N y for jail purposes, <br /> rving the balance of the 1-1/2 131 dollars for the purpose of <br /> paying jail fees over a period of years with accrued interest: <br /> 3 Councilman ttti Overstreetsuggested that there should be adate apeci£ia <br /> for reply by the County and t a an ordinance should-beprepared to <br /> initiate the fund. <br /> 1 After discussion regarding whether mentionshould be made of increases <br /> et te <br /> based on the c i,Councilman Aldcroft commented that the <br /> and administrativestaff had concluded they could live with the cp <br /> factor. <br /> Councilman Michelson felt there should b nf the 1-1/2 millmill.ributi0n as the issue is coat of jail fees only and Councilman <br /> Stephenson agree, <br /> Aldcroft wondered if t Countymight <br /> minoOnstrue on s repthe offer <br /> ie m roe d <br /> c es a ry positive stet makeproposal in writig,1lasvin4 the <br /> 1-1/2 millions dollars o TheCity needs haveresolved Mwhat i <br /> will be paying over the n 10 years fox jail fees. e nded <br /> I , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.