My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982/12/29 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1982/12/29 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:48:03 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:00:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/29/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> Decernber 29,1982 <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> RESOLUTION(CB 8212-544) Motion Carried <br /> RSHOlOtAHlSO.22159:2010019: <br /> =Vat 21,916,854 was received during 1982 from the.003 transit sal. <br />; Tferetteht11:81%21=i%1VggrnIVA:112:Zntrg=1,05and09""' <br /> .e nantlt ZTIV'end't"" th6 00209" <br /> NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY TEE CITY OF EVERETT CITY COUNCIL that <br /> $327,992 be transferred from Retained Earnings to the Reserve for Capital <br /> Purchases. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> elation Carried <br /> eV; Councilman.rerstreet left the meeting at this t.e. <br /> COUNCIL BILL 8212-518 <br /> Final Reading <br /> An ordinance annexing certain property to the City of Everett 02 of 19th Ave <br /> SE at 100th St SE) <br /> Bruce Jones said on November 15,19E2 the Snohomish Coonty Boundary Review <br /> Board held a public hearing on the annexation of this property into.e <br /> Crty of Everett. At the conclusion of the hearing before fOur member.of <br /> the Boundary Review Board motion was made end seconded to deny the an <br /> nexation which resulted two votes two votes tie. Thereafter the <br /> Board considers that it could possibly reconsider.e matter when a fifth <br /> member has been appointed to the Board. The Governor is the appointee <br /> official and has not appointed a fifth member at time.c1 doesn't <br /> look 1.e he will be doing so in the future. <br /> He said under RCW 36.93.150 several alternative actions are suggested <br /> subDect.the following proviso"unless the Boa.shall disapprove a <br /> proposal it 608111 resentee)under.e appropriate statute for ap- <br /> proval of a public body". Thus he said the Boundary Review Board pro- <br /> cedures clearly mandate that a non action is not to impair.e <br /> k of the annexation proceedings. The City Council at this time cen vote <br /> this ordinance.na annex.is property into the city ,heY <br /> Moved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilmen Stephenson that this <br /> is declered to be the final reading of Council Bill No 8212-518 and Ne <br /> _ City Clerk is directed to call the roll for the final disposition of the <br /> - ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.