Laserfiche WebLink
73 <br /> February 23,1983 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING LID#703 <br /> Celia',Orono,of Jae Public Works Department,retorted this was <br /> public hearing o the finalassessment roll or D 8=03 forthe <br /> purpose ostreet, we n water improvements t R deaon Roads <br /> Cainooad,north aohe City limits. This LID <br /> vitiated <br /> b5majority p She re rt.the trelim... <br /> NY <br /> cost was$37,813; he final at is 8397,661.27. The final <br /> assesament and platmaprepresents those properties benefited <br /> by ee L�improvement <br /> the assessed o each property e <br /> spread nthe basis o area. This would be 15 ¢ LTD,with <br /> the interestrate an anticipated 118 or leas based n the bonds <br /> being sold as apart <br /> of a 2 million dollar d issue o .July 1, <br /> 1903. n eninsertion <br /> f the total final assessment amount aha rhe anticipated <br /> rate. 4i! <br /> There has n o t from Flora <br /> objecting toethena se stating they eas se <br /> nior coitioen in. <br /> it health,who could became destitute forcedtopay this. <br /> s. <br /> in t <br /> Ms. <br /> hichxoccurr then <br /> as pointed <br /> resultout <br /> Snohomish County's illegal short n � <br /> plat of its:propertyhis Their then e <br /> Folioed when theentirea appearedonrather <br /> wthan as z total piece. It is therefore.recommended that parcel <br /> eupublic <br /> hearing eo this L.I. be continued until March de to <br /> send out.new noticesreflectingboth parcels of County land. <br /> ved to Concilman Michelson,seconded by Co nc lma G p ,to P <br /> Lc conkinue Lhe public hearing.until March 23rd,u1983 <br /> Councilman Michelson asked B City could pay s <br /> until such time astheysell their property �y <br /> ohe ne' lied thii tco be done but the City might have to re to <br /> fund for this,abut would have to get this mo ewheree a <br /> It also was possible to place a lien on the property ort a City <br /> couldde spread the a e t t others in the L..D. 4E f. <br /> However,NA decide <br /> eepointed o this as a themca. <br /> flowforthe bonds. 1 edwthenquestion of determining <br /> qualifications for"disadvantaged or hardship'cases• <br /> Councilman uaet Committee had discussed t <br /> in a meeting ttodaysand sitd as theircon it not his <br /> appropriate to be involvedinthis type of was <br /> did <br /> • Peel v the other property owners to t more. <br /> Also,it was w notappropriater cm City t make thatkind <br /> determinationwhetheror not aoperson was drsedv paged. <br /> • Gilman Overstreet suggested using e senior exemption !I <br /> criteria aeguideline.99 th ' Y <br /> • Gilman G pointed out it w possible thered be 13 <br /> in upcoming <br /> L the that would be:unableto <br /> and Council against the 1 becoming g <br /> institution. :Wjt, <br /> commented <br /> entedas tthisnissueahod been raised intheCasino Road {t } <br /> Lu D occupy am single single-familydwelling t a do the land. 9heerty pointed t {' <br /> insthecc f this L.I.D.,the Feenst property would henthe eonly �{k <br /> one that qualified. <br /> d_y <br />