Laserfiche WebLink
89 <br /> March 11,1983 kid <br /> PUBLIC HEARING , .', <br /> e <br /> Dennis O ickaen,of the Planning Department,said o arch 2 983, <br /> the Council M1 d the 759 annexation t a. l.,A <br /> At that time the uncia passed to annexsetting <br /> a hearingfortoday <br /> to consider ac property <br /> to be <br /> ..., • <br /> present.toathe s5 homishfCountytBoundaryReview Board. cF y <br /> his was a 20 a eR site.behind the s descent to said <br /> it <br /> Park. Frier t the formal annexation therewould b <br /> ordinance an a binding rezone contra presented to theeCouncil. I e a' <br /> 336ntx Chairman <br /> rad All Commission, resl' <br /> aanneannexation hef bewoulbe no the <br /> and it is meal annexation. <br /> mr. the Count has no o113i c this <br /> They have ldiscussed.this with the Planning Departmentofthe <br /> o'v e e policy has been established. at <br /> o"1t v E fire would <br /> notet because there ue base no to <br /> fireto y d t would not change the revenue base o£the $ <br /> district. <br /> CouncilmanMichelson asked why the Skill Center'propperty w not <br /> �0L33is <br /> exed into the.City also, <br /> h icka replied thatthestate <br /> law precludes hem into joining anyoneelse1 an annexation process. kk ' <br /> At a later date they could request annexation to the City. 'L <br /> Councilman <br /> uncilman Grp <br /> asked how thisannexation tion would affect the Fire h <br /> L 411,and Mr.McIntyreMcIntyrerepliede that he was i <br /> concerned a <br /> losing s l <br /> any more of the district. 3 equeetedct t the fire <br /> District <br /> commissioners b notified when a proposed a exation as ..1. <br /> inthe works. He had n received any notification regarding this <br /> proposed annexation and had only found out about it through a citizen a5 � <br /> in he area.x re i <br /> :"exatin and no edeire861936 further wished t"peak the proposed ,' <br /> on red <br /> dbyi c£1man argue,seconded by Councilman Gipson,to close ',A <br /> theepublic heariv9.L <br /> Roll was <br /> led with all Councilmen voting yes,except Councilman <br /> called <br /> w <br /> yM� Overstreet, was excused. Motion Carried (N¢ 1. <br /> RESOLUTION <br /> 7: ip{,E <br /> Rs3luy 1n 158 n1ow9:321 bConcimeLn",to 8151 9y• <br /> A RESOLUTION of <br /> o k e City <br /> ad o t '•.ttAg <br /> Everett.61 Them 5property tis locatedenorthwest of parch ear and adjacent <br /> to existing City limit linea,and is described in Attachment A las on 3R <br /> file In the City Clerk's Office). - 5y._° <br /> WHBRBAS,the City Council has approved a petition forannexation AAAQaa <br /> i $. <br /> of the above described property t e City o Everett;and <br /> public hearing thereon pursuant to RCW 35.13.140 was <br /> held on March 11,1993:and <br /> I1 , <br /> ;1'1,1'k 1,, <br />