1983/03/11 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

1: 92 March 11,1983 this matter having come on for public hearing on the 9th day of February 1983,upon the aplication o :Falser Enterprises,Inc., f approval o s with contract; o HERD ,thea City Council oft Ciittyo t has consider. the Findings,Conclusions and Recommendationseof the Hearingu Examiner of the Everett in this matter dated February 2 983,Submitted by memorandum fof February 3,1983;tend WHEEZES, t the public hearing the Council heard additional testimony and statements from the City Planning Staff and dap proponents and mppoonen[s of the application a further considered exhibits,legal andumand arguments offered by all interested parties;and the City Co ince thatall interested parties have had an opportunity t beuheard fand that the Council is fully informed i he premises; o RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o£ F - Everett that theHCi matte ehall hereby enter its Findings and Concleusions i this FINDINGS follows: OF ACT • l The City Council adopts all Findings of Fa made by its Hearing , Examiner in this matter re which atiinconsistent ewith he additional findings made by the City Council as.further set forth herein. 2. That an recent history certain improvementshave have been made tothe residential properties in the neighborhood a the proposed r which tend to upgrade and preserve the neighborhood for residential m 11,1 area That the rezone area dna aaiace0t proerties continue at this time4to function s a viable residential lvl neighborhood. I4}�' That[ applrcenL has o able apac1 on hid property witha table z i g to allow khehabtivity whi h he proposes for the ILII area tobe rezoned. Nj 5. That there areata at this time sufficient o satisfy tE f zoned d3 sooty within the gnosia;area of this application to a iafy t needs o the community at thin timmingonnemBLsexiata w createadditional e zoning 1n this e F. additional c traffic would be generated o Fleming Street by theproposed rezone which would create a hazhzd to the of the residential a abutting Fleming Street. ,111 V. t the applicant's proposed use of the property in the proposed of the clutter invowhichTccanno pin itigate facto.such an pollution, noise and areawould which cannot be mitigated by the proposed conditions f the c degree sufficient o protect the inhabitants khe r ialzneigM1borhood fromadverse effects. CONCLUSIONS 1. That the applicant in this matter has sustained his burden to z show that the proposed r applicationwould benefit the health, safety or general welfare of the community. •