Laserfiche WebLink
267 <br /> TulY B],1983 <br />%Vpresident asked i anyone wished k peak on the proposed vacation <br /> 1.13 and no one replied. <br /> 1.01 <br />,. the publico henaz t�aring, Councilmantogas,seconded by Councilman Stephenson,to close <br /> LH1.19 poli w called with all Councilmen voting Yee,ercelst Councilman <br /> oti <br /> 1,51 Overstreet, a excused. t <br /> i 61 Motion Carried <br /> h. <br /> 1.19 Moved by Councilman Longue,seconded by Councilman Stephenson,tocon.. <br /> l.69 with the recommendation o£the Public Works Department and direct t <br /> 9.91 staff to prepareanordinance vacating 39th St.from the alley Westhof <br /> 5.M 9W ectVenue,Westerly3 tontthe tdIstteetOverpass,said vacs ioto be <br /> 1.15 sub to k a recommended.a <br /> 3.11 Boll was called with all Councilmen voting yes,except Councilman <br /> 1.15 Overstreet,who waw excused. -- .5 <br /> 1'15 Motion Carried x ' • <br /> 1.91 <br /> 9.15 <br /> B.10 <br /> 1_53 BIDS RECEIVED <br /> 1.03 �..I. <br /> Joe Kozlowski,Administrative Staff member,reported thefollowing bide <br /> were rete wed for Sewer/Utility Building at the Service Center, <br /> 3 Newland Const. xettion Federal auctian <br /> $570,906 $995,116 $575,468 <br /> Recommendation is to award the bidt <br /> to a Federal Construction Company, <br /> apparentO. low bidder. a saidthathave dealt with <br /> the architects <br /> FederConstruction and Bey they are a reputable firm. <br /> RID AWARD <br /> lman Aldcroft asked Mr vaki if all 3 of these bids w <br /> the tameb1 ing,in other words,did they all have the samespecs , <br /> to Fe by,and Mr.Kozlowski replied.yes. <br /> Councilman Stephenson then asked what the difference was between • <br /> thew bid and t first bid and s <br /> ki ase the first t bid 89981.1191251, 1196 • <br /> Wet w the eva <br /> ofaguideline to prospective bidders who then wcula <br />. design ow <br /> their building. I.. <br /> Moved by Councilman Alacroft,s by Councilman Michelson,to <br /> accept <br /> ias r the <br /> eno and low bid because are a local firm and the low <br /> is d wouldt pay taxes. <br /> answer a.question,B ty,CiA ney,s there <br /> seemed to be no question a Federal Construction <br /> responsive and res noble b The basis for rejecting a bid <br /> is that the bidder is not responsive or responsible. <br /> Councilmen-Michelson felt the Council:had right a bid <br /> and a Cept the second low if at was within a 58 ratio <br />