Laserfiche WebLink
t 314 <br /> ��s:', ,6,.i.yr. <br /> August 34,1953 <br /> I MO <br /> 44 7 m <br /> f MOUNTAIN VIEW PLAT APPEAL <br /> Dennis De 9ool D tr the alanine Da aappeal vethekPl than <br /> 11 School District i t Had files a y the <br /> r f mountain w SSwhichw approved there <br /> Lobi i pe of basis d f h developer <br /> to 1 Thepstaffeisemon <br /> recommendiool ng act fee or h nd policy District. <br /> . matter and theplatshould not be heldupuntil theissue is resolved. <br /> 4rF Attorney,pointed o t found that <br /> issue <br /> 3030, iota pl• at williaddanan anticipated 33 students tothisand <br /> 7., ed he developer shoo d et with the sSchool <br /> � I0 <br /> s <br /> the city as w legal authority to require growth fees. <br /> • aul Sjun assn,1ssistan SperinntendentoBnaness for the <br /> EverettahulDistrict, dlegal <br /> counsel <br /> iadvised <br /> XAYithe fees could notbeimposed,but felt student impact issue <br /> had <br /> t been adequately addressed. They were <br /> asking iCouncil reect <br /> this plat approval until they can an agreement xi.the developer, <br /> a they h don a pas with other developer,to alleviate a <br /> 0,43:313..11',e,'3, potential overcrowding problem of schools in that area.. <br /> Mr.Jones said the School District 1e as Council to make a <br /> 3,34'03.4 <br /> s fending in addition1001to those of the ear Examinerthatprovision j ; has shown t s developer has hfailed ik adequate <br /> r required under t subdivision statute atetheeplateapprovalb <br /> • ted subjecttoreview n 30 days etonsee hwhether they can get <br /> 4 f'.. together and arrive at some sort of agreement. <br /> 'i, Bert Cronin,Jr.,developerofMountain View Pd,reminded Council t <br /> ' this a fir approved19)3,with the first 4 - t <br /> i ii divisions developed es planned, However,OS was delayed due tsub <br /> ? economic conditions and hdto come back for approval. Alsothere was <br /> sub- <br /> i6,41, <br /> a change v the hearing examiner pr teas a resulting i this appeal <br /> . having to be heard by Council. t education was the <br /> ++'.' state's obligation an a was being aleft hhostage by this whole situatvm. <br /> Councilman uncilmanlOverstreet asked if he had m h he 5 District 8 <br /> `.N �t .Cronin replied the had n attendedhearing cexaminer meeting <br /> d <br /> ,., and merely a Paled after t decision.tIn the <br /> past he had talked to <br /> Y but got nowhere. <br /> Moved by Councilman Michelson,seconded 4,pC.i nb 15 Cr <br /> 1 1 8TS,yadopt-Councilman <br /> f dconcdeny-' <br /> Ery t,,,' doeslnot significantly adversely impact he dd Everett School stat rict.at <br /> �� 11, Roll was Called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> 1 Notion Carried <br /> ,3mayor <br /> M <br /> oore the City has been <br /> contact with theSchool District <br /> ,, regarding en said <br /> and Council be kept informed regardi <br /> n ' <br /> this. <br /> 3'1 <br /> 1 k3k <br /> f <br /> S ti0 ' <br />