Laserfiche WebLink
356 <br /> lg.] <br /> ' ,1 September 28,1983 <br /> fed <br /> Jtt eliminated most of built <br /> toto the pity of Everett Building Codes,which <br /> �I <br /> councilman Stephenson tthe hen <br /> ash if the City annexed thisare would <br /> l'; the City be addressing t asked <br /> p ba the Count,'and D nnls <br /> Derickson replied t e ata'a proposal wa i gle-family along Loganberry <br /> county's and hrs er proposal. Als a the s vice inwthe reeabwoner than tte <br /> nuse watesewer, <br /> poli a would be better <br /> because o water, e police service,et.. <br /> h <br /> 1i{ Heldt,of 9331 Loganberry L said he had started this petition <br /> ,p t n it originally came the C until in f problems, <br /> '3the Council had asked them to go back and start <br /> Y j h t this e a be a xed into the City and that othe lower densitybe <br /> y 1 given theepropertyhe annexation. petition with <br /> 1 f 9611 Loganberry Lane,presented a 13 <br /> I.} �� 1 opposing t <br /> d Councilmanichelson objected to the irregular linea o of <br /> annexationthe It it should squared of£adjacent <br /> Iy 100th assessed valuationtoofethr property would defeat e <br /> 1]¢ proposal.1 <br /> annexation the a ick f the wasincludedthe <br /> "III HLoganberry a n the ea <br /> Hurley,of 932)L an y id the 3 lots o e of <br /> Dor <br /> Loganberry <br /> ane directly gad a h et.had been cleared t allow <br /> filer park. he said he of to ile homes,but <br /> �'`yNp strictly trailers WW1 that he the <br /> e where <br /> fIP �, fartJ to her reek ands now thedirtsloughed into he creek and floodedtittown <br /> b h- o the north. <br /> 0+ t Kos then reportedh had reviewed the petition with the 13 signatures <br /> �y4b� and because of their objectionhadredonet annex boundary liner <br /> f p l` which eliminated the 11 parcelsat <br /> the southf here L <br /> 1 1 } ch had previously been includedn the a 1 e hademarn0 <br /> A 1 this map a Exhibit B. a <br /> ` O de,ox f property t the east of LoganberryaL ke in <br /> of the annexation and said <br /> of the area adjacent Loganberry Lam <br /> { fj ¶' <br /> favor <br /> hlthat v could not be annexed into thehe requested that <br /> � the Ge�east of tete and adthisnt to theWalterE. all Golf <br /> time. <br /> 1 .�f il'. LouellabJones,of 9505 LoganberrytLane,spoke eg vnet the eve anon. <br /> d,i II t ^ Dennis Derdeksov s i he council decided n thisz <br /> ,k: fuuezgurvr...dew,said <br /> niby Hr. ldstwou annex <br /> satisfactory <br /> 'Y',4,;"2' However,he felt the people inthisareahad been working <br /> 4, or this annexation or s time he would hope that the irregular <br /> 1 � <br /> boundary acould xheaadopted so that it would not be delayed any longer <br /> I'll I? t vedhby C oncilman Stephanaon,seconded by Councilman angue,to close <br /> �px III ha public hearing. L <br /> President anyone <br /> t ope asked ifyfurther wished to NotionCarried <br /> ek and no one rePlied. <br /> 6110,,EH Roll wecalled with ailC fvoting yes. <br /> i <br /> 1' <br />