Laserfiche WebLink
381 <br /> • <br /> October 26,1983 <br /> 132 Golf 11,063.37 5,478.10 5,585.27 2,339.92 <br /> 153 a ca 13,028.80 5,809.49 ],139.31 ]29.39 � <br /> 1904 Sewer 8 C Grants 5,950.96 2,215.10 14,021.78 8,058.60 I1 <br /> 410 W 58,035.00 20,339.74 29,700.25 13,515.36 1 <br /> 56,056.06 25,296.25 31,559.81 3,593.30 <br /> 501 Equipment Rental <br /> 2520.92 7,062.42 13,466.50 4,180.12 <br /> 503 Nkre Comp beif-Los 00.00 819.11 <br /> CEOY TOTALS $763,304.99 $331,652.30 $431,652.69 $130,309.24 <br /> NOLO HARMLESS AGREEMENT <br /> 0l11le_detector loop inatallationoon westlappxesch atnAiwrport/Casinofo <br /> Road. <br /> TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION CONSULTANT SELECTION <br /> To authorize wnselection for Federal Grant <br /> Demonstration Program <br /> to interconnect and synchronize traffic signals on Everett and Rucker <br /> Avenues in downtown area. <br /> tia,. LIG#705 REPORT OF PAYMENTS RECEIVED-(AO_) • <br /> hum <br /> ce20 City Tr a report of payments r ive4 during 30-day j`: <br /> prepayment periodeon LIO i]d$Ieverett all Nay Improvements). <br /> 99.E <br /> Stwas calConsent Agenda wa with Council,mvoting <br /> 77.8 YncimanLGCoanc,lmahn wldcervftusewo 'b'ent fr'm <br /> aentfrom end $P <br /> 39'# <br /> 31.11 Motion Carried <br /> 9'.W.46 COMMUNICATLONS BOIMING RE-ROOFING <br /> 4441 <br /> 33.W 4se Nezioveki,Meyor'e eteep member,reported that 2 bids had been <br /> 69.M received for re-roofingg the communications Building. The apparent <br /> 00.01 low b Riverside Roofing Cc.,manufactures their own material <br /> dp•gp and the.were some questions regarding F rating,and they were <br /> 4215 asked to produce somethinge that their materials met t standards <br /> 19N of the industry. <br /> now recommended that they pt <br /> another r wouldmeetthe specifications. i felt <br /> 1.!' this this was somethingthat could not be done,it was being nded <br /> that the bid cF Riverside Roofing Co.be declared n saponins <br /> iand <br /> 61.81 that the b be awarded to the other bidder,Walter C.Smith. <br /> 49.01 <br /> 59.°1 ant Weed said t e was a ca of whether or not the change in <br /> 61.61 roofing materials conetituiedaa material change in the originalM <br /> 1111 supplies t re bid and Mr. vaki said he felt i did. he <br /> s6.# Need said t were <br /> Department mentis recommendingt either reject c <br /> 00.00 lvw bio s non-responsivee-bid thewhole project <br /> 23'13 Moved by Councilman Michelson,seconded by Councilman Longus,t <br /> 0150 e the lox bid a non-responsive a o award the bid Walter C. <br /> smith Roofers at their bid of$23,006.50. 41i t <br /> 1 <br />