Laserfiche WebLink
)91 <br /> • <br /> November 2,1983 <br /> PUBLIC ILEARING <br /> r City Attorney,said this x the public hearing o the <br /> mukilteonWat District's appeal of the Final Declaration o <br /> significanceoftheproposed Loganberry Lane area Non <br /> GSth Avenue west) p e sed that he packet concerning this appeal <br /> in the Council agendabemarked°Exhibit 1 He aid the appellant <br /> was t in a asked to presets their brief t <br /> the C 1 attendance <br /> he marked was <br /> 2 addition L e letter' <br /> Council, <br /> September 19,1983,attached t their b the position o <br /> datedthe September <br /> x District ti cthat,to <br /> of brief, <br /> study n <br /> ow in <br /> . process one L theye ware the City Council to delay. • <br /> the annexation the study is completed. <br /> • Bob handles,of the Planning Department,was sworn in. He then said <br /> environmentalthe checklist x completed as shown in the agenda <br /> packeta pointedoutthe letter answering the attorney's <br /> • ached i appeal. saidethedevelopment will o with <br /> without theannexation an He <br /> densities proposed by the City a <br /> csshan hose densities dthat areprovidedalready b= he County <br /> omprehensive Plan. said both oma Plan and EIS ted <br /> that the Mukilteo N District was consulted about the ap sed <br /> land e designations eand the District oindicated it could provide <br /> adequate sewerand water eservices. s <br /> said the annexation proposal <br /> indicates that residential lande <br /> u densities a t likely <br /> exceed densities d atedd by the Paine Field Comp Plan. Develop- <br /> ment with rthe densities <br /> permitted in the Paine Field <br /> Comp Plan were analyzed in detail i Paine Field Plan EIS <br /> and s the land a impacts a will not intensive as those ince use <br /> underthea omp Plan bfor sthe <br /> ar ,the land use impacts of annexation will not be significant. <br /> Bruce Yon.then asked what his position was in the said be was the B handles <br /> lhc also commented <br /> he <br /> c this particular and the appeal that t®this <br /> was happealed to the HearinExaminer in annexation <br /> jurisdicn and <br /> said i should be heard beforeheCouncil. <br /> then said a ary of Mr.Dandles'remarks would be typed <br /> and marked as Exhibitsp3�. <br /> ved) ncilmn Michelson;seconded by Councilman Gipson,to <br /> close UeCpublic hearing. _ <br /> eaident Pope asked if anyone further wished t speak and no one <br /> plied. <br /> • <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Councilman Aldcroft,a Councilman Michelson,t <br /> Moved <br /> adhmldbthDeclaration of Non-significance d any the appeal and <br /> opt the fings of fact d clusions of law as follows. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. The City of Everett proposed to annex approximately <br /> 107 acres <br /> Orth o 100th 8 east of Pasch Park and west of <br /> Walter E.Hall Golf Course. <br />