Laserfiche WebLink
60 <br /> February 15,1964 <br /> Tanis Marsh,member f thePlanning Commission,thanked tunc <br /> Council <br /> the workshop session held{day and e elthat another <br /> wouldbe aelntnsidered. She then briefly <br /> reviewed the process of this document <br /> b 1979. She said <br /> any public hearings had be andtheseei single family <br /> residential policies a lust one dphaseoftheep cess. <br /> f 3425 Tulalip,spoke o e high qualityofeffort and <br /> results t felt there x serious inconsistencies that needed <br /> obechanged,such as contradictory a regarding duplexes. <br /> also voiced c regarding d anderecommended that%e <br /> He <br /> be eliminatedcandsalso delete theilasst sentence in the preface <br /> 1 ! referring to duplexes. <br /> Viola Ours of 551 Pilchuck Path,said this was certainly consistent <br /> rf <br /> with the growth management plan as it was mandated to the Planning <br /> work <br /> f use and felt was a good compromise aftermanyurs <br /> o£ many groups and the Planning a offered <br /> a great deal of flexibility. She pointed out SectionA.3.which would <br /> R1.5 z smaller,more affordable housing,andnot' necessarily increasedzoning <br /> density.2Mrs.Ouzsler lso spokenadministra- <br /> tive <br /> dministre <br /> tiveaprocess for duplexes v R zoning,thePRO sec which she <br /> felt would result 1 greater predictability and less f h <br /> the past,group living section nd the nee for updateooflthe general <br /> b.. <br /> plan for the City. <br /> S'; Councilman <br /> red about the section dealing with historic <br /> preservationosDennis O saidthiswill be work during <br /> he year for the central Everett <br /> p�. John Robinettlnof 2117 5th St.,Osaidathe City wen in n a new <br /> Comp Plan. Although a lot of timehadTone vthis-singlefamily <br /> housing policy,he f m of L contents would be damaging and <br /> resuwritlt <br /> in a nHe o-growth <br /> thepplan andviolate <br /> eas property rights <br /> -zones and <br /> I:'x':. thatEIS statements o consaid certain sidered c areas of concern. <br /> Robinetttalso commented tc of r and homeowners,er <br /> administrative proceolvingtconcentrationrcriteria for duplexes, <br /> lack of predictability,and den <br /> In ane r o Overstreet comparing tis <br /> I tpolicytowhat is followed oatCpresent,nMRobinett�saidrhe�interpreted <br /> his s belng more restrictive than the present process and limit <br /> flexibility and decision-making. <br /> I, Dennis n n pointed outthere were sometechnical flaws v <br /> project density calculation which would be nvetigated and reviewed. <br /> Councilman Gipson asked Mr.Robinett if he had been working with the <br /> Planning Commission and he replied he had become involved in the late <br /> stagesof the policy, <br /> r„ Chuck Mnaer,Planning C i member,took exception t the negative <br /> comments alofweighig Inputandattesto t public <br /> participation great <br /> R asked s input was when they were <br /> trying o develop this policy. <br /> Councilman <br /> u <br /> Morrow pointed o n <br /> City its citizens t heart and <br /> not heart <br /> to give the impression that apartment renters <br /> re <br />