Laserfiche WebLink
165 <br /> 1 <br /> April 25.1984 <br /> ErvineGerryI <br /> reported the applicants,P Selland Brian Stafford, <br /> have ment <br /> p[ohibitingted a rezone of c a Inevaandith a uaed car/ots,auto c wrecking Iii <br /> yards,grain elevators,junk yards a adult a es),and <br /> requiring a rejects as they are proposed <br /> for development.pre said this ape= 19th Ave z Comprehensive <br /> Plan are which wasadoptedby Council Resolution o November 2,1983, <br /> and thisrezonewill implement theland use proposedinPlan. <br /> He d theproposedthe Silver Lake Shopping <br /> Center borderedoneast by just <br /> Avenue SE and abuts x-5. <br /> Hed <br /> po' l <br /> developer will have to come back with a specific <br /> site plan review with the staff prior y actual development of this 1. <br /> property. <br /> Councilman Morrow asked about the road terminating south o£ 0th St. 1! <br /> ought this is whe the road x supposed t o east <br /> ao 19thSt.and Mr.Ervinee this planned inrthe gCommp Plan but <br /> Public M Department felt athey hdid wn want100thbecome ('' <br /> majpx in section as motorists might use this as a bypass for c19th Ave. -, <br /> to he south. <br /> Mr a pointed out aDennis Gregoire stating that,i 1�' <br /> light ofthenelgbborhoodmc sed d he Council's discussion J <br /> of t entertainment [these ordinances have modified <br /> the c related specifically prohibit adultd <br /> entertainment uses in C-2tzoning.reThe zones aeltant for all <br /> 3nra supportingithis a option <br /> would best modify rthe dre the proposed C-2Pzoning t C-1 <br /> with the C zoning not permitting a tri meat activities <br /> as of o rdinannccenisac currentlyproposed. The <br /> staff adoes lnot favor this optionthereare a number of land use <br /> activities,such as industrial parks,boat buildings,sheet metal <br /> shops furniture manufacturing and repair,et would netbei.` <br /> permitted u the C-1 zoning. The greater ng s in C-2 <br /> may en intensive developmentof this area and with <br /> performanceoc rola co ained in he contractual agreement, he <br /> sea will be compatiblewithadjacent residential uses. <br /> Councilman Michelson asked if the City waN not <br /> ting certain <br /> uses allowed in this z when <br /> iallowed in other C-2 zones, <br /> e pointed o thiswaseby mu with the ' <br /> and Mr.Ervine <br /> developer as he did not want thea types of uses in his development. <br /> Night,representing the developer,mai Comp Plan for <br /> th1. <br /> is area it wasdeterminedt should beC-2a I:, <br /> they d' t intend to have adultentertainmentkui aso <br /> rea. i„ <br /> However, <br /> a why the was prohibited through concomitant agreement. <br /> z <br /> Chuck Moser,of 2118 Pine,a member of the Planning Commission,said <br /> he felt the Comp Plan should be changed if 16th Avenue is n extended 'l <br /> to 100th St.a outlined in the Com Plan. a felt na.re eetchenging i!.' <br /> this x roper w o go.pHe t disputingzthe <br /> reaeoning the Public Works Departmentag ging this street align- <br /> but he did feel it should a done bynthe Comp Plan methodrather <br /> than the xesone. . <br /> Councilman Gipson felt the rezone process made things flow faster and �• <br /> .° <br /> better because when the C P1 adopted it we known of knoof • <br /> some of the problems that mia <br /> might t in he future and the rezone <br /> made this a more workable solution. <br />