Laserfiche WebLink
196 <br /> • <br /> May <br /> 1989 3 <br /> of the <br /> t49gn9ee98 <br /> ph, regular <br /> in b <br /> workshop <br /> session in meeting City aI <br /> PresStephenson <br /> presiding an8 all ou ilmenn <br /> attendance exceptCnilmanLengu,who was excused.I Also in <br /> PlanninC mmissionmembeesFriel, umel, • <br /> attendance were <br /> Marsh,Persons,Moser and <br /> single ram.r <br /> Gary the Planning Department, <br /> slutionamending the yrg <br /> residential policies. He then reviewedt policies <br /> presented <br /> afsmiby Planning Commission italternatives the <br /> stf had interpreted the direction of <br /> the Council. <br /> xe <br /> Commission's <br /> c <br /> alternative changed the Planning <br /> pointed efirst <br /> s policies name or Family single a ily Policies. t <br /> medium Density Policies". The Planningrssron <br /> policy s limited nu lex shoud be allowed <br /> guidelines.but in ms single family neighborhoods. <br /> I alternative <br /> 'duplexes attached housing <br /> Doan limited a Sets <br /> multiple family housing ould ' <br /> inlow and m density neighborhoods (low a at edium density <br /> neighborhoods are which allow development d 1-5 ens-10 <br /> dwelling units per gross acre). <br /> e <br /> In <br /> Section <br /> policyA.1, the the same <br /> as the <br /> original Planning Commission recommendation <br /> tthat "important <br /> ogle ftneighborhoods"was changed[ read'important <br /> medium density residential <br /> a ¢tion 1 policA.2, the <br /> I� Planning Commission's ¢tion n t specialcriteria <br /> regulatingthec saysthatha sign and building <br /> should be allowed to duplexes r in -2 Alimited <br /> emberf duplexes should be applied when zoned <br /> s through the <br /> II special ProperePermit process in the <br /> nthe low <br /> er d <br /> ensi <br /> ty <br /> s ogle <br /> family neighborhoods lMl d ar <br /> Thealternativestatesingglefamilydetached <br /> da aceda9 <br /> preserved <br /> whereverppss _ Duplexes, attached housing nd <br /> multiple family housingshould <br /> ballowed only' n Planned <br /> developments ldoww1tyareas <br /> II Duplexes should bedensity <br /> residential administrative process <br /> medium <br /> density residential <br /> 82uti utilizing <br /> regulate• <br /> distribution,lesiprydbuildigdsig <br /> oh variety <br /> oM1 ttl <br /> Planned developments in medium sipyesidentiall areas (planned <br /> 1 developments those are cthrough detailed <br /> • <br /> discretionary s plan reviewprocess, such as PM , lusters of <br /> Idivisions or other similar mechanisms). <br /> , Mr.Hummel of the Planning Commission too <br /> with ten <br /> , alternative and felt all of these duplexes would be centered <br /> Tanis• one location. Marsh also fel <br /> that it was very vague <br /> , criteria and location,etc, she thongM1 <br /> that it should be distribution <br /> be nailed down more closely. <br /> • Doughty[td alternative for this section <br /> • <br /> n <br /> iccould std stsrresie types should be alloed i <br /> medium. low and density residential s on zPo sites tna <br /> whichunder conditions preserveenhance qualityo he <br /> community. <br /> This would be in M-S, -1,R-2 and PRD developments. <br />