Laserfiche WebLink
185 <br /> May 3,1E84 <br /> esident Stephenson announced t Agenda Item t3'regarding the <br /> sign a t the n corner Broadway a California had been <br /> deleted from t agenda a the parties concerned had been able to <br /> ark out an.agreement. <br /> 0 Council BILL NO.844-36 IR <br /> t FINAL BEADING <br /> an g for a avbesa <br /> t ballot ORDINANCE <br /> heploca ion f a Navy <br /> in City 4,, <br /> movedci seconded by Councilman o <br /> by d to Pope, nCMichelson,1 that <br /> this 1 declared to bis final dr reading of Council 1 844-35 final <br /> City Clerk fiance ted to call the roll for the final <br /> dispositionf he ordinance. <br /> t ouncilman Morrow then gave the folioxing statement •I cognise <br /> 1 that how I perceive es thing might be altogether different than <br /> else a respect others opinions. That's what makes this g._ <br /> scountry o se great and usual-freepression and interchange Of <br /> ideas. <br /> r From where I am minfrom whether for again the <br /> po g has little to d 1 h his crucial charter <br /> Prerogative 1 f petition and initiative. <br /> r 4t <br /> 0 It is pure and simple what is happening here in Everett. The <br /> Administration s o frightened o citizens opinions that a plan <br /> emasculate and manipulate the of <br /> petition by introducing a <br /> e ion ordinance has been.conceived and facilitated[ alter he h <br /> citizen' rhra ted them by they Everett Charter to <br /> o June <br /> ,1968. <br /> net has happened is thatthe Council, through administrative <br /> Pis e submitting its own ordinance because[ Council <br /> is able of bm a prospectof dosing its islative <br /> precluded by by council the h question about legislative w action being <br /> the petition x undertaken t faith <br /> I <br /> people who were not intentionally trying o use crafty deception Band <br /> pervasive illegalities a bte editorialise a editor of The �,=af <br /> May let in a le entitled The Initiative o it. lkJ <br /> Herald <br /> heard t individuals framing the Navy Ordinance ehad <br /> sought advice frim our city attorney but'were denied assistance. <br /> The Navy ordinance inferred:that prior to , <br /> votingtheyuntil the environmental impact study w <br /> submitted ea with a e public hearings before having a <br /> which could along <br /> t the <br /> any police[£tett 12 to 18 months eye <br /> This would allow a electron <br /> f e o be informed away. <br /> obvious Eby o hurried eaction an <br /> advisory vote by this N that x submitting <br /> a <br /> informed. voting citizenry or valid information concerned <br /> will be <br /> available from the cenvironmental impact study. <br />